Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PSECX vs RMFEX
PSECX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts PSECX vs RMFEX
1789 Growth and Income C
Price$18.95
Change+$0.08 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets32.41M
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$60.79
Change+$0.27 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.54B
PSECX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PSECX vs. RMFEX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PSECX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. PSECX (32.4M). RMFEX pays higher dividends than PSECX: RMFEX (1.53) vs PSECX (0.40). PSECX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: PSECX (15 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). PSECX (2.03) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). RMFEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. PSECX (20.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than PSECX: RMFEX (250) vs PSECX (2000). RMFEX (11.74) and PSECX (11.47) have marching annual gain over last year. RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 62.99 vs. PSECX (49.87).
| PSECX | RMFEX | PSECX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.03 | 0.62 | 327% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.03 | 0.62 | 327% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.326 | 11.527 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 32.4M | 111B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.40 | 1.53 | 26% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.47 | 11.74 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.18 | 32.08 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.87 | 62.99 | 79% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.71 | 88.96 | 68% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement