Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PSECX vs RMFEX
PSECX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts PSECX vs RMFEX
1789 Growth and Income C
Price$18.05
Change-$0.19 (-1.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets31.09M
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$57.86
Change-$0.45 (-0.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.76B
PSECX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PSECX vs. RMFEX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PSECX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 106B vs. PSECX (31.1M). RMFEX pays higher dividends than PSECX: RMFEX (1.58) vs PSECX (0.47). PSECX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: PSECX (14 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). PSECX (2.03) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). RMFEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. PSECX (20.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than PSECX: RMFEX (250) vs PSECX (2000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.03 vs. PSECX (8.29). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 62.32 vs. PSECX (48.36).
| PSECX | RMFEX | PSECX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.03 | 0.62 | 327% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.03 | 0.62 | 327% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.151 | 6.152 | 35% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 31.1M | 106B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.47 | 1.58 | 29% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.29 | 9.03 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.84 | 29.63 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.36 | 62.32 | 78% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.13 | 76.27 | 64% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement