Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PSECX vs RMFEX
PSECX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts PSECX vs RMFEX
1789 Growth and Income C
Price$18.92
Change-$0.07 (-0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets32.2M
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$60.46
Change-$0.15 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.9B
PSECX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PSECX vs. RMFEX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PSECX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. PSECX (32.2M). RMFEX pays higher dividends than PSECX: RMFEX (1.51) vs PSECX (0.40). PSECX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: PSECX (15 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). PSECX (2.03) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). RMFEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. PSECX (20.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than PSECX: RMFEX (250) vs PSECX (2000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.10 vs. PSECX (7.70). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 57.34 vs. PSECX (47.59).
| PSECX | RMFEX | PSECX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.03 | 0.62 | 327% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.03 | 0.62 | 327% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.156 | 10.922 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 32.2M | 110B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.40 | 1.51 | 26% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.70 | 8.10 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.24 | 23.84 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.59 | 57.34 | 83% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.45 | 86.04 | 70% |