Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PSECX vs RMFEX
PSECX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts PSECX vs RMFEX
1789 Growth and Income C
Price$19.17
Change+$0.01 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets32.26M
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$59.73
Change+$0.23 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.8B
PSECX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PSECX vs. RMFEX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PSECX is a Hold and RMFEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. PSECX (32.3M). RMFEX pays higher dividends than PSECX: RMFEX (1.43) vs PSECX (0.34). PSECX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: PSECX (15 years) vs RMFEX (24 years). PSECX (2.03) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). RMFEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. PSECX (20.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than PSECX: RMFEX (250) vs PSECX (2000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.33 vs. PSECX (3.62). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 48.36 vs. PSECX (41.04).
| PSECX | RMFEX | PSECX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.03 | 0.62 | 327% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.03 | 0.62 | 327% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.590 | 9.965 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 32.3M | 112B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.34 | 1.43 | 24% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.62 | 8.33 | 43% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.95 | 30.01 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.04 | 48.36 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | 65.39 | 99.29 | 66% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement