Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PSECX vs RMFCX
PSECX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts PSECX vs RMFCX
1789 Growth and Income C
Price$18.72
Change+$0.10 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets32.11M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$59.46
Change+$0.39 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.01B
PSECX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PSECX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PSECX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. PSECX (32.1M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than PSECX: RMFCX (1.27) vs PSECX (0.40). PSECX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: PSECX (14 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). PSECX (2.03) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. PSECX (20.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PSECX: RMFCX (250) vs PSECX (2000). PSECX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.56 vs. RMFCX (11.47). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 61.83 vs. PSECX (53.96).
| PSECX | RMFCX | PSECX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.03 | 0.91 | 223% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.03 | 0.91 | 223% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.023 | 9.596 | 63% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 32.1M | 109B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.40 | 1.27 | 32% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.56 | 11.47 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.81 | 29.27 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.96 | 61.83 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.87 | 79.21 | 72% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement