Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PSECX vs RMEBX
PSECX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts PSECX vs RMEBX
1789 Growth and Income C
Price$18.92
Change-$0.07 (-0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets32.2M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$60.40
Change-$0.15 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.9B
PSECX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PSECX vs. RMEBX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PSECX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. PSECX (32.2M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than PSECX: RMEBX (1.11) vs PSECX (0.40). PSECX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: PSECX (15 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). PSECX (2.03) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. PSECX (20.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than PSECX: RMEBX (250) vs PSECX (2000). PSECX (7.70) and RMEBX (7.63) have marching annual gain over last year. RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 53.85 vs. PSECX (47.59).
| PSECX | RMEBX | PSECX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.03 | 1.07 | 190% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.03 | 1.07 | 190% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.156 | 10.612 | 67% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 32.2M | 110B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.40 | 1.11 | 36% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.70 | 7.63 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.24 | 22.19 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.59 | 53.85 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.45 | 77.43 | 78% |