Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PSECX vs RMEBX
PSECX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts PSECX vs RMEBX
1789 Growth and Income C
Price$18.05
Change-$0.19 (-1.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets31.09M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$57.84
Change-$0.46 (-0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.76B
PSECX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PSECX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PSECX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 106B vs. PSECX (31.1M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than PSECX: RMEBX (1.16) vs PSECX (0.47). PSECX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: PSECX (14 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). PSECX (2.03) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. PSECX (20.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than PSECX: RMEBX (250) vs PSECX (2000). RMEBX (8.54) and PSECX (8.29) have marching annual gain over last year. RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 58.69 vs. PSECX (48.36).
| PSECX | RMEBX | PSECX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.03 | 1.07 | 190% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.03 | 1.07 | 190% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.151 | 5.923 | 36% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 31.1M | 106B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.47 | 1.16 | 40% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.29 | 8.54 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.84 | 27.89 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.36 | 58.69 | 82% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.13 | 68.22 | 72% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement