Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PSECX vs RMEBX
PSECX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts PSECX vs RMEBX
1789 Growth and Income C
Price$19.33
Change+$0.12 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets32.3M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$62.36
Change+$0.51 (+0.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.18B
PSECX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PSECX vs. RMEBX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PSECX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. PSECX (32.3M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than PSECX: RMEBX (1.05) vs PSECX (0.34). PSECX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: PSECX (15 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). PSECX (2.03) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. PSECX (20.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than PSECX: RMEBX (250) vs PSECX (2000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.81 vs. PSECX (2.56). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 55.95 vs. PSECX (44.65).
| PSECX | RMEBX | PSECX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.03 | 1.07 | 190% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.03 | 1.07 | 190% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.816 | 13.527 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 32.3M | 111B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.34 | 1.05 | 33% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.56 | 4.81 | 53% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.02 | 38.19 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.65 | 55.95 | 80% |
| Returns for 10 years | 66.69 | 89.36 | 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement