PSEC
Price
$2.88
Change
-$0.01 (-0.35%)
Updated
Sep 8, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.34B
58 days until earnings call
WHF
Price
$8.68
Change
-$0.08 (-0.91%)
Updated
Sep 8, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
203.61M
59 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

PSEC vs WHF

Header iconPSEC vs WHF Comparison
Open Charts PSEC vs WHFBanner chart's image
Prospect Capital
Price$2.88
Change-$0.01 (-0.35%)
Volume$49.67K
Capitalization1.34B
WhiteHorse Finance
Price$8.68
Change-$0.08 (-0.91%)
Volume$745
Capitalization203.61M
PSEC vs WHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PSEC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PSEC vs. WHF commentary
Sep 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PSEC is a Hold and WHF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 09, 2025
Stock price -- (PSEC: $2.89 vs. WHF: $8.76)
Brand notoriety: PSEC and WHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PSEC: 85% vs. WHF: 138%
Market capitalization -- PSEC: $1.34B vs. WHF: $203.61M
PSEC [@Investment Managers] is valued at $1.34B. WHF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $203.61M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $170.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.56B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PSEC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWHF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • PSEC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WHF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, WHF is a better buy in the long-term than PSEC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PSEC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WHF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PSEC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WHF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WHF is a better buy in the short-term than PSEC.

Price Growth

PSEC (@Investment Managers) experienced а -3.02% price change this week, while WHF (@Investment Managers) price change was +2.46% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +44.99%.

Reported Earning Dates

PSEC is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

WHF is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.12% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PSEC($1.34B) has a higher market cap than WHF($204M). WHF has higher P/E ratio than PSEC: WHF (54.75) vs PSEC (12.59). WHF YTD gains are higher at: -2.005 vs. PSEC (-25.840). WHF has less debt than PSEC: WHF (363M) vs PSEC (2.03B).
PSECWHFPSEC / WHF
Capitalization1.34B204M655%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-25.840-2.0051,289%
P/E Ratio12.5954.7523%
RevenueN/A9.51M-
Total Cash43.4MN/A-
Total Debt2.03B363M559%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PSEC vs WHF: Fundamental Ratings
PSEC
WHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
7
Undervalued
4
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9837
SMR RATING
1..100
1982
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6460
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1003
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WHF's Valuation (4) in the null industry is in the same range as PSEC (7). This means that WHF’s stock grew similarly to PSEC’s over the last 12 months.

WHF's Profit vs Risk Rating (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PSEC (98). This means that WHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PSEC’s over the last 12 months.

PSEC's SMR Rating (19) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WHF (82). This means that PSEC’s stock grew somewhat faster than WHF’s over the last 12 months.

WHF's Price Growth Rating (60) in the null industry is in the same range as PSEC (64). This means that WHF’s stock grew similarly to PSEC’s over the last 12 months.

WHF's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PSEC (100). This means that WHF’s stock grew significantly faster than PSEC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PSECWHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
51%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
39%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
51%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
42%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 26 days ago
47%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
49%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
47%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PSEC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NRCD0.05N/A
N/A
Nashville Records, Inc.
TRLM3.00N/A
N/A
Truleum Inc.
MLYBY4.47N/A
N/A
Malayan Banking Berhad
SPSTY7.52N/A
N/A
Singapore Post, Ltd.
TUIFF10.18N/A
N/A
TUI AG

PSEC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PSEC has been loosely correlated with OBDC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PSEC jumps, then OBDC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PSEC
1D Price
Change %
PSEC100%
+0.35%
OBDC - PSEC
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.14%
MFIC - PSEC
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.38%
FSK - PSEC
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.55%
BBDC - PSEC
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.21%
CSWC - PSEC
54%
Loosely correlated
-0.17%
More

WHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WHF has been loosely correlated with CGBD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WHF jumps, then CGBD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WHF
1D Price
Change %
WHF100%
+0.81%
CGBD - WHF
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.14%
PSEC - WHF
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.35%
MFIC - WHF
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.38%
FSK - WHF
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.55%
SLRC - WHF
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.06%
More