Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PSCMX vs SSGSX
PSCMX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts PSCMX vs SSGSX
Putnam Small Cap Value R6
Price$18.01
Change+$0.25 (+1.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets278.23M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$47.38
Change+$0.08 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.64B
PSCMX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PSCMX vs. SSGSX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PSCMX is a StrongBuy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.64B vs. PSCMX (278M). PSCMX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: PSCMX (0.86) vs SSGSX (0.47). PSCMX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: PSCMX (12 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than PSCMX (0.76). PSCMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 86.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). PSCMX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: PSCMX (500) vs SSGSX (2500). PSCMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.32 vs. SSGSX (-1.56). PSCMX return over 5 years is better than : 97.15 vs. SSGSX (22.95).
| PSCMX | SSGSX | PSCMX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.26 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.26 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.915 | 2.046 | 338% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500 | 2500 | 20% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 278M | 5.64B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.86 | 0.47 | 181% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.32 | -1.56 | -341% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.52 | 3.97 | 617% |
| Returns for 5 years | 97.15 | 22.95 | 423% |
| Returns for 10 years | 30.58 | 24.71 | 124% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement