Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PSCMX vs SSGSX
PSCMX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts PSCMX vs SSGSX
Putnam Small Cap Value R6
Price$17.08
Change-$0.25 (-1.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets264.71M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.80
Change-$0.57 (-1.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.23B
PSCMX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PSCMX vs. SSGSX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PSCMX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.23B vs. PSCMX (265M). PSCMX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: PSCMX (0.89) vs SSGSX (0.49). PSCMX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: PSCMX (12 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than PSCMX (0.76). PSCMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 86.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). PSCMX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: PSCMX (500) vs SSGSX (2500). PSCMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.55 vs. SSGSX (-12.62). PSCMX return over 5 years is better than : 69.72 vs. SSGSX (8.71).
| PSCMX | SSGSX | PSCMX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.26 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.26 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.423 | -0.129 | -1,875% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500 | 2500 | 20% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 265M | 5.23B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.89 | 0.49 | 184% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.55 | -12.62 | 52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.84 | -6.25 | -205% |
| Returns for 5 years | 69.72 | 8.71 | 800% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.34 | 20.45 | 124% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement