Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PSCIX vs QDARX
PSCIX vs QDARX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PSCIX vs. QDARX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PSCIX is a Hold and QDARX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QDARX has more cash in the bank: 1.89B vs. PSCIX (305M). PSCIX pays higher dividends than QDARX: PSCIX (4.50) vs QDARX (1.26). PSCIX was incepted earlier than QDARX: PSCIX (13 years) vs QDARX (11 years). PSCIX (1.88) is less costly to investors than QDARX (1.78). QDARX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 361.00 vs. PSCIX (127.00). PSCIX has a lower initial minimum investment than QDARX: PSCIX (100000) vs QDARX (50000000). PSCIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.44 vs. QDARX (5.90). QDARX return over 5 years is better than : 39.06 vs. PSCIX (17.92).
| PSCIX | QDARX | PSCIX / QDARX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 1.77 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.88 | 1.78 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.301 | 5.202 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 50000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 305M | 1.89B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.50 | 1.26 | 355% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.44 | 5.90 | 160% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.79 | 13.88 | 179% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.92 | 39.06 | 46% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.10 | 79.43 | 47% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers