Advertisement
PSCI vs RUSHA
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PSCI is a Hold and RUSHA is a Hold.
RUSHA | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 73 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 36 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 15 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 57 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 30 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 90 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| PSCI | RUSHA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 61% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% | 4 days ago 56% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 64% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 70% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 86% | 5 days ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 80% | 7 days ago 60% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 55% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | N/A |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BQLCX | 23.19 | 0.03 | +0.13% |
| Bright Rock Quality Large Cap Instl | |||
| GSURX | 65.20 | -0.01 | -0.02% |
| Goldman Sachs US Equity Insights R | |||
| RAFBX | 37.35 | -0.02 | -0.05% |
| American Funds AMCAP R2 | |||
| DFUVX | 33.67 | -0.05 | -0.15% |
| DFA US Large Cap Value III | |||
| NWHGX | 15.51 | -0.13 | -0.83% |
| Nationwide Bailard Cogntv Val R6 | |||
PSCI and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PSCI has been closely correlated with NPO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PSCI jumps, then NPO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PSCI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PSCI | 100% | -0.67% | ||
| NPO - PSCI | 81% Closely correlated | -0.74% | ||
| RUSHA - PSCI | 80% Closely correlated | -1.71% | ||
| GTES - PSCI | 79% Closely correlated | -1.71% | ||
| AL - PSCI | 79% Closely correlated | -1.12% | ||
| FELE - PSCI | 79% Closely correlated | -0.64% | ||
More | ||||
RUSHA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RUSHA has been closely correlated with RUSHB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RUSHA jumps, then RUSHB could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RUSHA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RUSHA | 100% | -1.71% | ||
| RUSHB - RUSHA | 85% Closely correlated | -2.01% | ||
| AN - RUSHA | 70% Closely correlated | -0.88% | ||
| ABG - RUSHA | 68% Closely correlated | -0.68% | ||
| GPI - RUSHA | 68% Closely correlated | -1.91% | ||
| PAG - RUSHA | 66% Loosely correlated | -0.76% | ||
More | ||||