82 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PSCC vs SMPL
PSCC vs SMPL Comparison
Open Charts PSCC vs SMPL
Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Stapl ETF
Price$35.23
Change+$0.04 (+0.11%)
Volume$16.36K
Net Assets41.26M
Simply Good Foods Company (The)
Price$33.19
Change+$0.32 (+0.97%)
Volume$818.84K
Capitalization3.4B
PSCC vs SMPL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PSCC vs. SMPL commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PSCC is a Hold and SMPL is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SMPL: Fundamental Ratings
SMPL | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 34 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 88 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 41 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 76 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| PSCC | SMPL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 68% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 56% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 63% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 60% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 66% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 82% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 66% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 60% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
PSCC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PSCC has been loosely correlated with EPC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PSCC jumps, then EPC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PSCC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PSCC | 100% | +0.12% | ||
| EPC - PSCC | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.93% | ||
| IPAR - PSCC | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.78% | ||
| SMPL - PSCC | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.97% | ||
| ENR - PSCC | 60% Loosely correlated | +1.51% | ||
| PSMT - PSCC | 58% Loosely correlated | +2.45% | ||
More | ||||
SMPL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMPL has been loosely correlated with FLO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SMPL jumps, then FLO could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMPL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMPL | 100% | +0.97% | ||
| FLO - SMPL | 49% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| MKC - SMPL | 45% Loosely correlated | +0.17% | ||
| GIS - SMPL | 45% Loosely correlated | +0.24% | ||
| KHC - SMPL | 45% Loosely correlated | -0.35% | ||
| CPB - SMPL | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.31% | ||
More | ||||