PRXXF
Price
$18.63
Change
-$0.20 (-1.06%)
Updated
Dec 16 closing price
QH
Price
$1.44
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 18, 02:47 PM (EDT)
Ad is loading...

PRXXF vs QH

Header iconPRXXF vs QH Comparison
Open Charts PRXXF vs QHBanner chart's image
Paradox Interactive AB
Price$18.63
Change-$0.20 (-1.06%)
Volume$500
CapitalizationN/A
Quhuo
Price$1.44
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
PRXXF vs QH Comparison Chart
Loading...
QH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PRXXF vs. QH commentary
Dec 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRXXF is a Hold and QH is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 18, 2024
Stock price -- (PRXXF: $18.63 vs. QH: $1.44)
Brand notoriety: PRXXF and QH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PRXXF: 192% vs. QH: 102%
Market capitalization -- PRXXF: $3.03B vs. QH: $3.66M
PRXXF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $3.03B. QH’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $3.66M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.69B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PRXXF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileQH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • PRXXF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • QH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PRXXF is a better buy in the long-term than QH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

QH’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • QH’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

PRXXF (@Packaged Software) experienced а +8.69% price change this week, while QH (@Packaged Software) price change was +2.13% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +4.84%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +17.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.40%.

Reported Earning Dates

QH is expected to report earnings on Nov 29, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+4.84% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PRXXF($3.03B) has a higher market cap than QH($3.66M). PRXXF has higher P/E ratio than QH: PRXXF (40.16) vs QH (3.21). PRXXF YTD gains are higher at: 5.254 vs. QH (-2.041). PRXXF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.53B vs. QH (47.8M). PRXXF has more cash in the bank: 844M vs. QH (178M). QH has less debt than PRXXF: QH (104M) vs PRXXF (126M). QH has higher revenues than PRXXF: QH (3.69B) vs PRXXF (2.26B).
PRXXFQHPRXXF / QH
Capitalization3.03B3.66M82,669%
EBITDA1.53B47.8M3,190%
Gain YTD5.254-2.041-257%
P/E Ratio40.163.211,252%
Revenue2.26B3.69B61%
Total Cash844M178M474%
Total Debt126M104M121%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PRXXF: Fundamental Ratings
PRXXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
27
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
90
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
71
SMR RATING
1..100
58
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
44
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
12
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
QH
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
QH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME31.261.82
+6.18%
GameStop Corp
TSLA479.8616.84
+3.64%
Tesla
AAPL253.482.44
+0.97%
Apple
BTC.X106140.600000110.890625
+0.10%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY604.29-2.50
-0.41%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust

PRXXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PRXXF has been loosely correlated with RMDEF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PRXXF jumps, then RMDEF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PRXXF
1D Price
Change %
PRXXF100%
N/A
RMDEF - PRXXF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
QH - PRXXF
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.05%
KLDI - PRXXF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LSPKF - PRXXF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EMOR - PRXXF
24%
Poorly correlated
-17.62%
More

QH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QH has been loosely correlated with OBIIF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QH jumps, then OBIIF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QH
1D Price
Change %
QH100%
+1.05%
OBIIF - QH
51%
Loosely correlated
N/A
PRXXF - QH
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GDC - QH
29%
Poorly correlated
+4.74%
APCX - QH
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.79%
EGHSF - QH
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.16%
More