PRTS
Price
$1.08
Change
-$0.04 (-3.57%)
Updated
Mar 10, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
57.9M
57 days until earnings call
RDBBF
Price
$0.17
Change
+$0.05 (+41.67%)
Updated
Feb 28 closing price
Capitalization
44.58M
Ad is loading...

PRTS vs RDBBF

Header iconPRTS vs RDBBF Comparison
Open Charts PRTS vs RDBBFBanner chart's image
CarParts.com
Price$1.08
Change-$0.04 (-3.57%)
Volume$2.49K
Capitalization57.9M
ARTICORE GROUP
Price$0.17
Change+$0.05 (+41.67%)
Volume$147.8K
Capitalization44.58M
PRTS vs RDBBF Comparison Chart
Loading...
PRTS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PRTS vs. RDBBF commentary
Mar 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRTS is a StrongBuy and RDBBF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Mar 11, 2025
Stock price -- (PRTS: $0.88 vs. RDBBF: $0.17)
Brand notoriety: PRTS and RDBBF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Internet Retail industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PRTS: 49% vs. RDBBF: 626%
Market capitalization -- PRTS: $57.9M vs. RDBBF: $44.58M
PRTS [@Internet Retail] is valued at $57.9M. RDBBF’s [@Internet Retail] market capitalization is $44.58M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Internet Retail] industry ranges from $2.06T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Internet Retail] industry is $42.24B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PRTS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRDBBF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • PRTS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RDBBF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both PRTS and RDBBF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PRTS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • PRTS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

PRTS (@Internet Retail) experienced а -10.49% price change this week, while RDBBF (@Internet Retail) price change was +30.77% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Retail industry was -1.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.58%.

Reported Earning Dates

PRTS is expected to report earnings on May 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Internet Retail (-1.92% weekly)

The internet retail industry includes companies that sell products and services through the Internet. With more and more consumers using online retailers, the companies have seen a big increase in the use of their services. Some of the companies in the group are focused on selling business-to-business products and services. Others sell business-to-consumer products and services. Internet retailers offer a wide variety of products like books, apparel, and electronics. Some companies even specialize in only one or two categories. One potentially critical factor for players to thrive in this space is the quality and speed of product delivery. This requires an investment in efficient distribution networks. Things like logistics are important factors in the success in the extremely competitive industry. For a company to stay relevant in the industry it must have effective pricing strategies and upgraded websites. The websites must be easy to navigate and engaging for customers. In addition to the revenues generated from straight sales, internet retailers can generate revenue from subscription fees and advertising. Amazon.com, Inc., Alibaba Group, and JD.com are some of the global leaders.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PRTS($57.9M) has a higher market cap than RDBBF($44.6M). RDBBF YTD gains are higher at: -5.556 vs. PRTS (-18.407).
PRTSRDBBFPRTS / RDBBF
Capitalization57.9M44.6M130%
EBITDA-12.44MN/A-
Gain YTD-18.407-5.556331%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue612MN/A-
Total Cash38.1MN/A-
Total Debt43.8MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PRTS vs RDBBF: Fundamental Ratings
PRTS
RDBBF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5530
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
61
Fair valued
58
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6558
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9597
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RDBBF's Valuation (58) in the null industry is in the same range as PRTS (61) in the Internet Retail industry. This means that RDBBF’s stock grew similarly to PRTS’s over the last 12 months.

RDBBF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as PRTS (100) in the Internet Retail industry. This means that RDBBF’s stock grew similarly to PRTS’s over the last 12 months.

RDBBF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as PRTS (100) in the Internet Retail industry. This means that RDBBF’s stock grew similarly to PRTS’s over the last 12 months.

RDBBF's Price Growth Rating (58) in the null industry is in the same range as PRTS (65) in the Internet Retail industry. This means that RDBBF’s stock grew similarly to PRTS’s over the last 12 months.

PRTS's P/E Growth Rating (95) in the Internet Retail industry is in the same range as RDBBF (97) in the null industry. This means that PRTS’s stock grew similarly to RDBBF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PRTS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
88%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
PRTS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTC.X87222.1950001156.515600
+1.34%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME24.30-0.10
-0.41%
GameStop Corp
AAPL235.93-2.10
-0.88%
Apple
SPY576.86-6.91
-1.18%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
TSLA272.04-12.61
-4.43%
Tesla

PRTS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PRTS has been loosely correlated with KGGNF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PRTS jumps, then KGGNF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PRTS
1D Price
Change %
PRTS100%
-3.16%
KGGNF - PRTS
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BABA - PRTS
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.73%
DTC - PRTS
22%
Poorly correlated
+4.39%
W - PRTS
22%
Poorly correlated
-8.14%
JMIA - PRTS
21%
Poorly correlated
+4.33%
More

RDBBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RDBBF and JFBR have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RDBBF and JFBR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RDBBF
1D Price
Change %
RDBBF100%
N/A
JFBR - RDBBF
20%
Poorly correlated
-7.83%
PRTS - RDBBF
20%
Poorly correlated
-3.16%
MCARY - RDBBF
15%
Poorly correlated
-2.19%
MPNGF - RDBBF
9%
Poorly correlated
-3.57%
PXHI - RDBBF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More