Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PRPZX vs SMRPX
PRPZX vs SMRPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PRPZX vs. SMRPX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRPZX is a Hold and SMRPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMRPX has more cash in the bank: 1.22B vs. PRPZX (484M). PRPZX pays higher dividends than SMRPX: PRPZX (48.64) vs SMRPX (4.43). PRPZX was incepted earlier than SMRPX: PRPZX (12 years) vs SMRPX (10 years). PRPZX (1.18) is less costly to investors than SMRPX (1.05). SMRPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. PRPZX (70.00). PRPZX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMRPX: PRPZX (0) vs SMRPX (1000000). SMRPX (6.83) and PRPZX (6.50) have marching annual gain over last year. SMRPX (174.76) and PRPZX (171.28) have equivalent 5 years return.
| PRPZX | SMRPX | PRPZX / SMRPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.02 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.05 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.236 | 1.518 | 147% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 484M | 1.22B | 40% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 48.64 | 4.43 | 1,098% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.50 | 6.83 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.70 | 63.62 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 171.28 | 174.76 | 98% |
| Returns for 10 years | 75.17 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement