Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PRPZX vs SMRPX
PRPZX vs SMRPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PRPZX vs. SMRPX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRPZX is a Hold and SMRPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMRPX has more cash in the bank: 1.24B vs. PRPZX (463M). PRPZX pays higher dividends than SMRPX: PRPZX (11.68) vs SMRPX (4.54). PRPZX was incepted earlier than SMRPX: PRPZX (12 years) vs SMRPX (10 years). PRPZX (1.18) is less costly to investors than SMRPX (1.05). SMRPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. PRPZX (70.00). PRPZX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMRPX: PRPZX (0) vs SMRPX (1000000). SMRPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.37 vs. PRPZX (-5.61). SMRPX (114.75) and PRPZX (110.47) have equivalent 5 years return.
| PRPZX | SMRPX | PRPZX / SMRPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.02 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.05 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.002 | 1.451 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 463M | 1.24B | 37% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 11.68 | 4.54 | 257% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.61 | -0.37 | 1,525% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.45 | 58.17 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 110.47 | 114.75 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | 152.04 | 208.27 | 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement