Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PRPZX vs SMFPX
PRPZX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PRPZX vs. SMFPX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRPZX is a Buy and SMFPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.26B vs. PRPZX (504M). PRPZX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: PRPZX (49.29) vs SMFPX (3.39). PRPZX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: PRPZX (12 years) vs SMFPX (13 years). SMFPX (2.15) is less costly to investors than PRPZX (1.18). SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. PRPZX (70.00). PRPZX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMFPX: PRPZX (0) vs SMFPX (1000). SMFPX (16.77) and PRPZX (16.63) have marching annual gain over last year. PRPZX return over 5 years is better than : 168.35 vs. SMFPX (150.05).
| PRPZX | SMFPX | PRPZX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 2.12 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 2.15 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.310 | 1.709 | 194% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 504M | 1.26B | 40% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 49.29 | 3.39 | 1,455% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.63 | 16.77 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.11 | 61.00 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 168.35 | 150.05 | 112% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.65 | 35.12 | 144% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement