Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PRPZX vs SMFPX
PRPZX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PRPZX vs. SMFPX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRPZX is a Hold and SMFPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.22B vs. PRPZX (484M). PRPZX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: PRPZX (48.64) vs SMFPX (3.37). PRPZX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: PRPZX (12 years) vs SMFPX (13 years). SMFPX (2.15) is less costly to investors than PRPZX (1.18). SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. PRPZX (70.00). PRPZX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMFPX: PRPZX (0) vs SMFPX (1000). PRPZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.50 vs. SMFPX (5.68). PRPZX return over 5 years is better than : 171.28 vs. SMFPX (160.73).
| PRPZX | SMFPX | PRPZX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 2.12 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 2.15 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.236 | 0.691 | 324% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 484M | 1.22B | 40% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 48.64 | 3.37 | 1,444% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.50 | 5.68 | 114% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.70 | 58.42 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 171.28 | 160.73 | 107% |
| Returns for 10 years | 75.17 | 56.91 | 132% |