Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PRPZX vs SMFPX
PRPZX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PRPZX vs. SMFPX commentary
Dec 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRPZX is a Hold and SMFPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.24B vs. PRPZX (468M). PRPZX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: PRPZX (57.40) vs SMFPX (3.39). PRPZX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: PRPZX (12 years) vs SMFPX (13 years). SMFPX (2.15) is less costly to investors than PRPZX (1.18). SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. PRPZX (70.00). PRPZX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMFPX: PRPZX (0) vs SMFPX (1000). SMFPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.69 vs. PRPZX (-0.90). PRPZX return over 5 years is better than : 133.70 vs. SMFPX (123.47).
| PRPZX | SMFPX | PRPZX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 2.12 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 2.15 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.262 | 3.286 | -8% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 468M | 1.24B | 38% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 57.40 | 3.39 | 1,691% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.90 | 2.69 | -33% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.00 | 58.46 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 133.70 | 123.47 | 108% |
| Returns for 10 years | 112.51 | 126.97 | 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement