Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PRPZX vs SMFPX
PRPZX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PRPZX vs. SMFPX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRPZX is a Buy and SMFPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.29B vs. PRPZX (517M). PRPZX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: PRPZX (51.02) vs SMFPX (3.50). PRPZX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: PRPZX (12 years) vs SMFPX (12 years). SMFPX (2.15) is less costly to investors than PRPZX (1.18). SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. PRPZX (70.00). PRPZX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMFPX: PRPZX (0) vs SMFPX (1000). SMFPX (23.39) and PRPZX (22.82) have marching annual gain over last year. PRPZX return over 5 years is better than : 170.73 vs. SMFPX (147.28).
| PRPZX | SMFPX | PRPZX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 2.12 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 2.15 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.953 | 3.588 | 138% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 517M | 1.29B | 40% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 51.02 | 3.50 | 1,457% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.82 | 23.39 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.33 | 63.75 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 170.73 | 147.28 | 116% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.44 | 26.62 | 152% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement