Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PRPZX vs SMFPX
PRPZX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PRPZX vs. SMFPX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRPZX is a Hold and SMFPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.25B vs. PRPZX (484M). PRPZX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: PRPZX (57.40) vs SMFPX (3.39). PRPZX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: PRPZX (12 years) vs SMFPX (13 years). SMFPX (2.15) is less costly to investors than PRPZX (1.18). SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. PRPZX (70.00). PRPZX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMFPX: PRPZX (0) vs SMFPX (1000). SMFPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.38 vs. PRPZX (-4.77). SMFPX (131.43) and PRPZX (131.25) have equivalent 5 years return.
| PRPZX | SMFPX | PRPZX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 2.12 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 2.15 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.404 | 4.284 | 9% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 484M | 1.25B | 39% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 57.40 | 3.39 | 1,691% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.77 | 0.38 | -1,263% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.59 | 50.94 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 131.25 | 131.43 | 100% |
| Returns for 10 years | 120.93 | 124.35 | 97% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement