Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PRPZX vs SMFPX
PRPZX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PRPZX vs. SMFPX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRPZX is a Hold and SMFPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.28B vs. PRPZX (502M). PRPZX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: PRPZX (49.29) vs SMFPX (3.40). PRPZX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: PRPZX (12 years) vs SMFPX (13 years). SMFPX (2.15) is less costly to investors than PRPZX (1.18). SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. PRPZX (70.00). PRPZX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMFPX: PRPZX (0) vs SMFPX (1000). SMFPX (16.26) and PRPZX (15.56) have marching annual gain over last year. PRPZX return over 5 years is better than : 152.16 vs. SMFPX (136.95).
| PRPZX | SMFPX | PRPZX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 2.12 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 2.15 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.234 | 3.485 | 121% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 502M | 1.28B | 39% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 49.29 | 3.40 | 1,450% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.56 | 16.26 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.67 | 53.06 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 152.16 | 136.95 | 111% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.88 | 47.42 | 126% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement