Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PRPZX vs SMFPX
PRPZX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PRPZX vs. SMFPX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRPZX is a Hold and SMFPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.29B vs. PRPZX (504M). PRPZX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: PRPZX (10.95) vs SMFPX (3.19). PRPZX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: PRPZX (12 years) vs SMFPX (13 years). SMFPX (2.15) is less costly to investors than PRPZX (1.18). PRPZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. SMFPX (52.00). PRPZX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMFPX: PRPZX (0) vs SMFPX (1000). SMFPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.78 vs. PRPZX (1.24). PRPZX return over 5 years is better than : 134.36 vs. SMFPX (123.81).
| PRPZX | SMFPX | PRPZX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 2.12 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 2.15 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.679 | 8.213 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 504M | 1.29B | 39% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 10.95 | 3.19 | 343% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.24 | 6.78 | 18% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.87 | 66.05 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 134.36 | 123.81 | 109% |
| Returns for 10 years | 162.49 | 182.43 | 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement