Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PRPZX vs RMLPX
PRPZX vs RMLPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PRPZX vs. RMLPX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRPZX is a Buy and RMLPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMLPX has more cash in the bank: 1.17B vs. PRPZX (517M). PRPZX pays higher dividends than RMLPX: PRPZX (51.02) vs RMLPX (5.33). PRPZX was incepted earlier than RMLPX: PRPZX (12 years) vs RMLPX (8 years). PRPZX (1.18) is less costly to investors than RMLPX (1.10). PRPZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. RMLPX (15.00). PRPZX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMLPX: PRPZX (0) vs RMLPX (2500). PRPZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.82 vs. RMLPX (15.61). RMLPX return over 5 years is better than : 227.09 vs. PRPZX (170.73).
| PRPZX | RMLPX | PRPZX / RMLPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.10 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.10 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.953 | 5.123 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 517M | 1.17B | 44% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 51.02 | 5.33 | 956% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.82 | 15.61 | 146% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.33 | 57.69 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 170.73 | 227.09 | 75% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.44 | N/A | - |