Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PRPZX vs RMLPX
PRPZX vs RMLPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PRPZX vs. RMLPX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRPZX is a Hold and RMLPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMLPX has more cash in the bank: 1.21B vs. PRPZX (463M). PRPZX pays higher dividends than RMLPX: PRPZX (11.68) vs RMLPX (5.21). PRPZX was incepted earlier than RMLPX: PRPZX (12 years) vs RMLPX (8 years). PRPZX (1.18) is less costly to investors than RMLPX (1.10). PRPZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. RMLPX (15.00). PRPZX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMLPX: PRPZX (0) vs RMLPX (2500). RMLPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.68 vs. PRPZX (-5.61). RMLPX return over 5 years is better than : 186.77 vs. PRPZX (110.47).
| PRPZX | RMLPX | PRPZX / RMLPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.10 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.10 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.002 | 4.459 | 22% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 463M | 1.21B | 38% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 11.68 | 5.21 | 224% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.61 | 6.68 | -84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.45 | 60.88 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 110.47 | 186.77 | 59% |
| Returns for 10 years | 152.04 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers