Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PRPZX vs RMLPX
PRPZX vs RMLPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PRPZX vs. RMLPX commentary
Dec 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRPZX is a Hold and RMLPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMLPX has more cash in the bank: 1.17B vs. PRPZX (468M). PRPZX pays higher dividends than RMLPX: PRPZX (57.40) vs RMLPX (4.94). PRPZX was incepted earlier than RMLPX: PRPZX (12 years) vs RMLPX (8 years). PRPZX (1.18) is less costly to investors than RMLPX (1.10). PRPZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. RMLPX (15.00). PRPZX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMLPX: PRPZX (0) vs RMLPX (2500). RMLPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.36 vs. PRPZX (-0.90). RMLPX return over 5 years is better than : 200.26 vs. PRPZX (133.70).
| PRPZX | RMLPX | PRPZX / RMLPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.10 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.10 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.262 | 6.093 | -4% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 468M | 1.17B | 40% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 57.40 | 4.94 | 1,163% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.90 | 6.36 | -14% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.00 | 57.48 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 133.70 | 200.26 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 112.51 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement