Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PRPZX vs RMLPX
PRPZX vs RMLPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PRPZX vs. RMLPX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRPZX is a Hold and RMLPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMLPX has more cash in the bank: 1.16B vs. PRPZX (484M). PRPZX pays higher dividends than RMLPX: PRPZX (48.64) vs RMLPX (5.02). PRPZX was incepted earlier than RMLPX: PRPZX (12 years) vs RMLPX (8 years). PRPZX (1.18) is less costly to investors than RMLPX (1.10). PRPZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. RMLPX (15.00). PRPZX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMLPX: PRPZX (0) vs RMLPX (2500). PRPZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.50 vs. RMLPX (3.11). RMLPX return over 5 years is better than : 267.58 vs. PRPZX (171.28).
| PRPZX | RMLPX | PRPZX / RMLPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.10 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.10 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.236 | 4.196 | 53% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 484M | 1.16B | 42% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 48.64 | 5.02 | 970% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.50 | 3.11 | 209% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.70 | 59.74 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 171.28 | 267.58 | 64% |
| Returns for 10 years | 75.17 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement