PRPS
Price
$1.77
Change
+$0.02 (+1.14%)
Updated
Dec 3 closing price
Capitalization
15.92M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
QFIN
Price
$18.98
Change
-$0.61 (-3.11%)
Updated
Dec 3 closing price
Capitalization
2.51B
103 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

PRPS vs QFIN

Header iconPRPS vs QFIN Comparison
Open Charts PRPS vs QFINBanner chart's image
PROPELLUS
Price$1.77
Change+$0.02 (+1.14%)
Volume$4.34K
Capitalization15.92M
Qfin Holdings
Price$18.98
Change-$0.61 (-3.11%)
Volume$2.17M
Capitalization2.51B
PRPS vs QFIN Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PRPS vs. QFIN commentary
Dec 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRPS is a Hold and QFIN is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 04, 2025
Stock price -- (PRPS: $1.80 vs. QFIN: $19.59)
Brand notoriety: PRPS and QFIN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Savings Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PRPS: 48% vs. QFIN: 53%
Market capitalization -- PRPS: $15.92M vs. QFIN: $2.51B
PRPS [@Savings Banks] is valued at $15.92M. QFIN’s [@Savings Banks] market capitalization is $2.51B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Savings Banks] industry ranges from $636.11B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Savings Banks] industry is $21.35B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PRPS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileQFIN’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • PRPS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • QFIN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both PRPS and QFIN are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PRPS’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QFIN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PRPS’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • QFIN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, QFIN is a better buy in the short-term than PRPS.

Price Growth

PRPS (@Savings Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while QFIN (@Savings Banks) price change was +0.56% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was +0.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.97%.

Reported Earning Dates

QFIN is expected to report earnings on Mar 17, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Savings Banks (+0.08% weekly)

A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QFIN($2.51B) has a higher market cap than PRPS($15.9M). PRPS YTD gains are higher at: 71.429 vs. QFIN (-46.587). QFIN has higher revenues than PRPS: QFIN (15.7B) vs PRPS (3.03M).
PRPSQFINPRPS / QFIN
Capitalization15.9M2.51B1%
EBITDA-1.65MN/A-
Gain YTD71.429-46.587-153%
P/E RatioN/A2.73-
Revenue3.03M15.7B0%
Total Cash6.51KN/A-
Total Debt32.3KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PRPS vs QFIN: Fundamental Ratings
PRPS
QFIN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
9
Undervalued
6
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10072
SMR RATING
1..100
1006
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3488
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10097
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

QFIN's Valuation (6) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as PRPS (9) in the null industry. This means that QFIN’s stock grew similarly to PRPS’s over the last 12 months.

QFIN's Profit vs Risk Rating (72) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as PRPS (100) in the null industry. This means that QFIN’s stock grew similarly to PRPS’s over the last 12 months.

QFIN's SMR Rating (6) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is significantly better than the same rating for PRPS (100) in the null industry. This means that QFIN’s stock grew significantly faster than PRPS’s over the last 12 months.

PRPS's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QFIN (88) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that PRPS’s stock grew somewhat faster than QFIN’s over the last 12 months.

QFIN's P/E Growth Rating (97) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as PRPS (100) in the null industry. This means that QFIN’s stock grew similarly to PRPS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PRPSQFIN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
87%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 29 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PRPS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
QFIN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
COSAX13.24N/A
N/A
Columbia Overseas Core A
SLMCX170.35N/A
N/A
Columbia Seligman Tech & Info A
SGNFX53.60N/A
N/A
Sparrow Growth No-Load
GREYX9.56N/A
N/A
GuideStone Funds Global Rl Est Secs Inst
HFYRX13.72N/A
N/A
Hartford Schroders Intl Multi-Cp Val R3

PRPS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PRPS and ASHTY have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PRPS and ASHTY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PRPS
1D Price
Change %
PRPS100%
N/A
ASHTY - PRPS
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
QFIN - PRPS
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.76%
LU - PRPS
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.98%
SUIG - PRPS
1%
Poorly correlated
+7.42%
RMIAF - PRPS
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

QFIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QFIN has been closely correlated with LX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QFIN jumps, then LX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QFIN
1D Price
Change %
QFIN100%
-0.76%
LX - QFIN
69%
Closely correlated
+0.62%
FINV - QFIN
67%
Closely correlated
-4.67%
XYF - QFIN
54%
Loosely correlated
-0.06%
LU - QFIN
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.98%
YRD - QFIN
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.68%
More