PRPS
Price
$1.62
Change
+$0.02 (+1.25%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
14.55M
QFIN
Price
$25.21
Change
-$0.08 (-0.32%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
3.32B
32 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

PRPS vs QFIN

Header iconPRPS vs QFIN Comparison
Open Charts PRPS vs QFINBanner chart's image
PROPELLUS
Price$1.62
Change+$0.02 (+1.25%)
Volume$2.82K
Capitalization14.55M
Qfin Holdings
Price$25.21
Change-$0.08 (-0.32%)
Volume$2.55M
Capitalization3.32B
PRPS vs QFIN Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PRPS vs. QFIN commentary
Oct 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRPS is a Hold and QFIN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 19, 2025
Stock price -- (PRPS: $1.62 vs. QFIN: $25.21)
Brand notoriety: PRPS and QFIN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Savings Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PRPS: 107% vs. QFIN: 138%
Market capitalization -- PRPS: $14.55M vs. QFIN: $3.32B
PRPS [@Savings Banks] is valued at $14.55M. QFIN’s [@Savings Banks] market capitalization is $3.32B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Savings Banks] industry ranges from $663.59B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Savings Banks] industry is $21.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PRPS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileQFIN’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • PRPS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • QFIN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, QFIN is a better buy in the long-term than PRPS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PRPS’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QFIN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PRPS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • QFIN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PRPS is a better buy in the short-term than QFIN.

Price Growth

PRPS (@Savings Banks) experienced а +47.00% price change this week, while QFIN (@Savings Banks) price change was -6.63% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was +0.78%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was +44.93%.

Reported Earning Dates

QFIN is expected to report earnings on Nov 19, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Savings Banks (+0.78% weekly)

A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QFIN($3.33B) has a higher market cap than PRPS($14.5M). PRPS YTD gains are higher at: 54.000 vs. QFIN (-31.264). QFIN has higher revenues than PRPS: QFIN (15.7B) vs PRPS (3.03M).
PRPSQFINPRPS / QFIN
Capitalization14.5M3.33B0%
EBITDA-1.65MN/A-
Gain YTD54.000-31.264-173%
P/E RatioN/A3.57-
Revenue3.03M15.7B0%
Total Cash6.51KN/A-
Total Debt32.3KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PRPS vs QFIN: Fundamental Ratings
PRPS
QFIN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
262
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
10
Undervalued
8
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10062
SMR RATING
1..100
1006
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3489
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10096
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5014

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

QFIN's Valuation (8) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as PRPS (10) in the null industry. This means that QFIN’s stock grew similarly to PRPS’s over the last 12 months.

QFIN's Profit vs Risk Rating (62) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PRPS (100) in the null industry. This means that QFIN’s stock grew somewhat faster than PRPS’s over the last 12 months.

QFIN's SMR Rating (6) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is significantly better than the same rating for PRPS (100) in the null industry. This means that QFIN’s stock grew significantly faster than PRPS’s over the last 12 months.

PRPS's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QFIN (89) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that PRPS’s stock grew somewhat faster than QFIN’s over the last 12 months.

QFIN's P/E Growth Rating (96) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as PRPS (100) in the null industry. This means that QFIN’s stock grew similarly to PRPS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PRPSQFIN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
20%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PRPS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QFIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RRRRX21.740.16
+0.74%
DWS RREEF Real Estate Securities Instl
DBUYX10.980.03
+0.27%
Davenport Insider Buying
FRDAX98.070.21
+0.21%
Franklin Rising Dividends Adv
MLNIX27.28N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Instl Glbl Concntr I
CSGZX100.63-0.49
-0.48%
Columbia Seligman Global Tech Inst

PRPS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PRPS and ASHTY have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PRPS and ASHTY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PRPS
1D Price
Change %
PRPS100%
+1.06%
ASHTY - PRPS
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.45%
QFIN - PRPS
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.32%
LU - PRPS
2%
Poorly correlated
-3.32%
SUIG - PRPS
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.65%
RMIAF - PRPS
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

QFIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QFIN has been loosely correlated with FINV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QFIN jumps, then FINV could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QFIN
1D Price
Change %
QFIN100%
-0.32%
FINV - QFIN
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.78%
LX - QFIN
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.20%
XYF - QFIN
49%
Loosely correlated
-1.66%
YRD - QFIN
47%
Loosely correlated
+2.43%
LU - QFIN
47%
Loosely correlated
-3.32%
More