Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PRPFX vs RLBAX
PRPFX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts PRPFX vs RLBAX
Permanent Portfolio Permanent I
Price$68.34
Change+$0.04 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.91B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$36.52
Change+$0.17 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets252.39B
PRPFX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PRPFX vs. RLBAX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRPFX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 252B vs. PRPFX (4.91B). RLBAX pays higher dividends than PRPFX: RLBAX (1.18) vs PRPFX (0.83). PRPFX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: PRPFX (43 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than PRPFX (0.82). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. PRPFX (22.14). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRPFX: RLBAX (250) vs PRPFX (1000). PRPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.87 vs. RLBAX (7.00). PRPFX return over 5 years is better than : 68.07 vs. RLBAX (37.04).
| PRPFX | RLBAX | PRPFX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 1.31 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 1.31 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 43 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.748 | 7.651 | 180% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 1000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.91B | 252B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.83 | 1.18 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.87 | 7.00 | 298% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.35 | 32.45 | 167% |
| Returns for 5 years | 68.07 | 37.04 | 184% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.31 | 58.01 | 152% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement