Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PRPFX vs RLBAX
PRPFX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts PRPFX vs RLBAX
Permanent Portfolio Permanent I
Price$69.04
Change-$0.11 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.16B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$37.05
Change-$0.01 (-0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets255.64B
PRPFX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PRPFX vs. RLBAX commentary
Aug 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRPFX is a StrongBuy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 256B vs. PRPFX (5.16B). RLBAX pays higher dividends than PRPFX: RLBAX (1.17) vs PRPFX (0.83). PRPFX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: PRPFX (43 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than PRPFX (0.81). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. PRPFX (22.14). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRPFX: RLBAX (250) vs PRPFX (1000). PRPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.67 vs. RLBAX (6.97). PRPFX return over 5 years is better than : 57.34 vs. RLBAX (33.83).
| PRPFX | RLBAX | PRPFX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 1.31 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 1.31 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 43 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.913 | 9.214 | 162% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 1000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.16B | 256B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.83 | 1.17 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.67 | 6.97 | 282% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.46 | 28.56 | 180% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.34 | 33.83 | 169% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.28 | 65.02 | 147% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement