Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PRPCX vs SMRPX
PRPCX vs SMRPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PRPCX vs. SMRPX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRPCX is a Hold and SMRPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMRPX has more cash in the bank: 1.22B vs. PRPCX (484M). PRPCX pays higher dividends than SMRPX: PRPCX (62.33) vs SMRPX (4.43). PRPCX was incepted earlier than SMRPX: PRPCX (12 years) vs SMRPX (10 years). PRPCX (2.20) is less costly to investors than SMRPX (1.05). SMRPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. PRPCX (70.00). PRPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMRPX: PRPCX (1000) vs SMRPX (1000000). SMRPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.83 vs. PRPCX (4.95). SMRPX return over 5 years is better than : 174.76 vs. PRPCX (154.20).
| PRPCX | SMRPX | PRPCX / SMRPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.20 | 1.02 | 216% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.20 | 1.05 | 210% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.103 | 1.518 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 484M | 1.22B | 40% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 62.33 | 4.43 | 1,407% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.95 | 6.83 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.30 | 63.62 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 154.20 | 174.76 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.06 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement