Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PRPCX vs SMFPX
PRPCX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PRPCX vs. SMFPX commentary
Dec 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRPCX is a Hold and SMFPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.25B vs. PRPCX (484M). PRPCX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: PRPCX (74.65) vs SMFPX (3.39). PRPCX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: PRPCX (12 years) vs SMFPX (13 years). PRPCX (2.20) and SMFPX (2.15) have similar cost to investors . SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. PRPCX (70.00). PRPCX (1000) and SMFPX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SMFPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.30 vs. PRPCX (-6.50). SMFPX return over 5 years is better than : 126.41 vs. PRPCX (108.16).
| PRPCX | SMFPX | PRPCX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.20 | 2.12 | 104% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.20 | 2.15 | 102% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.468 | 5.581 | -26% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 484M | 1.25B | 39% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 74.65 | 3.39 | 2,199% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.50 | 2.30 | -283% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.50 | 56.24 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 108.16 | 126.41 | 86% |
| Returns for 10 years | 109.47 | 147.57 | 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement