Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PRPCX vs SMFPX
PRPCX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PRPCX vs. SMFPX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRPCX is a Hold and SMFPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.24B vs. PRPCX (463M). PRPCX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: PRPCX (14.26) vs SMFPX (3.43). PRPCX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: PRPCX (12 years) vs SMFPX (13 years). PRPCX (2.20) and SMFPX (2.15) have similar cost to investors . SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. PRPCX (70.00). PRPCX (1000) and SMFPX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SMFPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.18 vs. PRPCX (-8.34). SMFPX return over 5 years is better than : 104.08 vs. PRPCX (94.52).
| PRPCX | SMFPX | PRPCX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.20 | 2.12 | 104% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.20 | 2.15 | 102% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.885 | 1.449 | 61% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 463M | 1.24B | 37% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 14.26 | 3.43 | 416% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.34 | -1.18 | 708% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.07 | 53.64 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 94.52 | 104.08 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | 120.94 | 177.89 | 68% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement