Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PRPAX vs SMRPX
PRPAX vs SMRPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PRPAX vs. SMRPX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRPAX is a Hold and SMRPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMRPX has more cash in the bank: 1.24B vs. PRPAX (463M). PRPAX pays higher dividends than SMRPX: PRPAX (12.25) vs SMRPX (4.54). PRPAX was incepted earlier than SMRPX: PRPAX (12 years) vs SMRPX (10 years). PRPAX (1.51) is less costly to investors than SMRPX (1.05). SMRPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. PRPAX (70.00). PRPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMRPX: PRPAX (1000) vs SMRPX (1000000). SMRPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.37 vs. PRPAX (-6.32). SMRPX return over 5 years is better than : 114.75 vs. PRPAX (106.30).
| PRPAX | SMRPX | PRPAX / SMRPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 1.02 | 143% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 1.05 | 144% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.077 | 1.451 | 74% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 463M | 1.24B | 37% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 12.25 | 4.54 | 270% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.32 | -0.37 | 1,721% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.62 | 58.17 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 106.30 | 114.75 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | 143.59 | 208.27 | 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement