Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PRPAX vs SMRPX
PRPAX vs SMRPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PRPAX vs. SMRPX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRPAX is a Hold and SMRPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMRPX has more cash in the bank: 1.31B vs. PRPAX (504M). PRPAX pays higher dividends than SMRPX: PRPAX (11.47) vs SMRPX (4.22). PRPAX was incepted earlier than SMRPX: PRPAX (12 years) vs SMRPX (10 years). PRPAX (1.51) is less costly to investors than SMRPX (1.05). PRPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. SMRPX (52.00). PRPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMRPX: PRPAX (1000) vs SMRPX (1000000). SMRPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.66 vs. PRPAX (0.47). SMRPX (135.35) and PRPAX (129.42) have equivalent 5 years return.
| PRPAX | SMRPX | PRPAX / SMRPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 1.02 | 143% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 1.05 | 144% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.720 | 8.317 | 93% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 504M | 1.31B | 38% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 11.47 | 4.22 | 272% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.47 | 7.66 | 6% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.66 | 70.88 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 129.42 | 135.35 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | 153.13 | 213.70 | 72% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers