Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PRPAX vs SMRPX
PRPAX vs SMRPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PRPAX vs. SMRPX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRPAX is a Hold and SMRPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMRPX has more cash in the bank: 1.22B vs. PRPAX (484M). PRPAX pays higher dividends than SMRPX: PRPAX (51.82) vs SMRPX (4.43). PRPAX was incepted earlier than SMRPX: PRPAX (12 years) vs SMRPX (10 years). PRPAX (1.51) is less costly to investors than SMRPX (1.05). SMRPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. PRPAX (70.00). PRPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMRPX: PRPAX (1000) vs SMRPX (1000000). SMRPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.83 vs. PRPAX (6.12). SMRPX (174.76) and PRPAX (166.31) have equivalent 5 years return.
| PRPAX | SMRPX | PRPAX / SMRPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 1.02 | 143% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 1.05 | 144% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.851 | 1.518 | 122% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 484M | 1.22B | 40% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 51.82 | 4.43 | 1,170% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.12 | 6.83 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.21 | 63.62 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 166.31 | 174.76 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 69.71 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement