Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PRPAX vs SMFPX
PRPAX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PRPAX vs. SMFPX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRPAX is a StrongBuy and SMFPX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.24B vs. PRPAX (490M). PRPAX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: PRPAX (54.44) vs SMFPX (3.55). PRPAX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: PRPAX (12 years) vs SMFPX (13 years). SMFPX (2.15) is less costly to investors than PRPAX (1.51). SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. PRPAX (70.00). PRPAX (1000) and SMFPX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SMFPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.38 vs. PRPAX (2.54). PRPAX (163.12) and SMFPX (158.15) have equivalent 5 years return.
| PRPAX | SMFPX | PRPAX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 2.12 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 2.15 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.868 | 3.286 | 148% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 490M | 1.24B | 39% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 54.44 | 3.55 | 1,535% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.54 | 3.38 | 75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.58 | 51.57 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 163.12 | 158.15 | 103% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.34 | 93.28 | 106% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement