Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PRPAX vs SMFPX
PRPAX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PRPAX vs. SMFPX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRPAX is a Buy and SMFPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.29B vs. PRPAX (517M). PRPAX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: PRPAX (54.37) vs SMFPX (3.50). PRPAX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: PRPAX (12 years) vs SMFPX (12 years). SMFPX (2.15) is less costly to investors than PRPAX (1.51). SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. PRPAX (70.00). PRPAX (1000) and SMFPX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SMFPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.39 vs. PRPAX (22.17). PRPAX return over 5 years is better than : 165.82 vs. SMFPX (147.28).
| PRPAX | SMFPX | PRPAX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 2.12 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 2.15 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.641 | 3.588 | 129% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 517M | 1.29B | 40% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 54.37 | 3.50 | 1,553% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.17 | 23.39 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.58 | 63.75 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 165.82 | 147.28 | 113% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.04 | 26.62 | 135% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement