Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PRPAX vs SMFPX
PRPAX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PRPAX vs. SMFPX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRPAX is a Hold and SMFPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.22B vs. PRPAX (484M). PRPAX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: PRPAX (51.82) vs SMFPX (3.37). PRPAX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: PRPAX (12 years) vs SMFPX (13 years). SMFPX (2.15) is less costly to investors than PRPAX (1.51). SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. PRPAX (70.00). PRPAX (1000) and SMFPX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PRPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.12 vs. SMFPX (5.68). PRPAX (166.31) and SMFPX (160.73) have equivalent 5 years return.
| PRPAX | SMFPX | PRPAX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 2.12 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 2.15 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.851 | 0.691 | 268% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 484M | 1.22B | 40% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 51.82 | 3.37 | 1,538% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.12 | 5.68 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.21 | 58.42 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 166.31 | 160.73 | 103% |
| Returns for 10 years | 69.71 | 56.91 | 123% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers