Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PRPAX vs SMFPX
PRPAX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PRPAX vs. SMFPX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRPAX is a Hold and SMFPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.28B vs. PRPAX (502M). PRPAX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: PRPAX (52.57) vs SMFPX (3.40). PRPAX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: PRPAX (12 years) vs SMFPX (13 years). SMFPX (2.15) is less costly to investors than PRPAX (1.51). SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. PRPAX (70.00). PRPAX (1000) and SMFPX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SMFPX (15.27) and PRPAX (15.19) have marching annual gain over last year. PRPAX return over 5 years is better than : 147.94 vs. SMFPX (134.92).
| PRPAX | SMFPX | PRPAX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 2.12 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 2.15 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.980 | 2.599 | 153% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 502M | 1.28B | 39% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 52.57 | 3.40 | 1,547% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.19 | 15.27 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.24 | 51.74 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 147.94 | 134.92 | 110% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.87 | 46.15 | 119% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement