Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PRPAX vs RMLPX
PRPAX vs RMLPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PRPAX vs. RMLPX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRPAX is a Hold and RMLPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMLPX has more cash in the bank: 1.16B vs. PRPAX (484M). PRPAX pays higher dividends than RMLPX: PRPAX (51.82) vs RMLPX (5.02). PRPAX was incepted earlier than RMLPX: PRPAX (12 years) vs RMLPX (8 years). PRPAX (1.51) is less costly to investors than RMLPX (1.10). PRPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. RMLPX (15.00). PRPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMLPX: PRPAX (1000) vs RMLPX (2500). PRPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.12 vs. RMLPX (3.11). RMLPX return over 5 years is better than : 267.58 vs. PRPAX (166.31).
| PRPAX | RMLPX | PRPAX / RMLPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 1.10 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 1.10 | 137% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.851 | 4.196 | 44% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 484M | 1.16B | 42% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 51.82 | 5.02 | 1,033% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.12 | 3.11 | 197% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.21 | 59.74 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 166.31 | 267.58 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | 69.71 | N/A | - |