Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PRPAX vs RMLPX
PRPAX vs RMLPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PRPAX vs. RMLPX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRPAX is a Hold and RMLPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMLPX has more cash in the bank: 1.18B vs. PRPAX (504M). PRPAX pays higher dividends than RMLPX: PRPAX (52.43) vs RMLPX (5.04). PRPAX was incepted earlier than RMLPX: PRPAX (12 years) vs RMLPX (8 years). PRPAX (1.51) is less costly to investors than RMLPX (1.10). PRPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. RMLPX (15.00). PRPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMLPX: PRPAX (1000) vs RMLPX (2500). PRPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.90 vs. RMLPX (9.84). RMLPX return over 5 years is better than : 248.03 vs. PRPAX (169.81).
| PRPAX | RMLPX | PRPAX / RMLPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 1.10 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 1.10 | 137% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.448 | 5.411 | 64% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 504M | 1.18B | 43% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 52.43 | 5.04 | 1,040% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.90 | 9.84 | 141% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.55 | 56.90 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 169.81 | 248.03 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 73.38 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement