Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PRPAX vs RMLPX
PRPAX vs RMLPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PRPAX vs. RMLPX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRPAX is a Hold and RMLPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMLPX has more cash in the bank: 1.2B vs. PRPAX (484M). PRPAX pays higher dividends than RMLPX: PRPAX (61.26) vs RMLPX (4.94). PRPAX was incepted earlier than RMLPX: PRPAX (12 years) vs RMLPX (8 years). PRPAX (1.51) is less costly to investors than RMLPX (1.10). PRPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. RMLPX (15.00). PRPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMLPX: PRPAX (1000) vs RMLPX (2500). RMLPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.35 vs. PRPAX (-5.52). RMLPX return over 5 years is better than : 214.50 vs. PRPAX (126.22).
| PRPAX | RMLPX | PRPAX / RMLPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 1.10 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 1.10 | 137% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.456 | 11.223 | -4% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 484M | 1.2B | 40% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 61.26 | 4.94 | 1,241% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.52 | 2.35 | -235% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.69 | 58.21 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 126.22 | 214.50 | 59% |
| Returns for 10 years | 112.98 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement