Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PRPAX vs RMLPX
PRPAX vs RMLPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PRPAX vs. RMLPX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRPAX is a Hold and RMLPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMLPX has more cash in the bank: 1.27B vs. PRPAX (504M). PRPAX pays higher dividends than RMLPX: PRPAX (11.47) vs RMLPX (4.76). PRPAX was incepted earlier than RMLPX: PRPAX (12 years) vs RMLPX (8 years). PRPAX (1.51) is less costly to investors than RMLPX (1.10). PRPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. RMLPX (12.00). PRPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMLPX: PRPAX (1000) vs RMLPX (2500). RMLPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.50 vs. PRPAX (0.47). RMLPX return over 5 years is better than : 212.93 vs. PRPAX (129.42).
| PRPAX | RMLPX | PRPAX / RMLPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 1.10 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 1.10 | 137% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.720 | 11.188 | 69% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 504M | 1.27B | 40% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 11.47 | 4.76 | 241% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.47 | 15.50 | 3% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.66 | 73.14 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 129.42 | 212.93 | 61% |
| Returns for 10 years | 153.13 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers