It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PROV’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRBKB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
PROV (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.77% price change this week, while RBKB (@Regional Banks) price change was +3.59% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.06%.
PROV is expected to report earnings on Feb 03, 2025.
RBKB is expected to report earnings on May 11, 2023.
Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
PROV | RBKB | PROV / RBKB | |
Capitalization | 92.7M | 93.6M | 99% |
EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | 30.047 | 19.876 | 151% |
P/E Ratio | 12.10 | 20.50 | 59% |
Revenue | 40.3M | 43.7M | 92% |
Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
Total Debt | 242M | 133M | 182% |
PROV | RBKB | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 86 | 8 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 37 Fair valued | 48 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 60 | 65 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 41 | 44 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 24 | 19 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 55 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PROV's Valuation (37) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as RBKB (48). This means that PROV’s stock grew similarly to RBKB’s over the last 12 months.
PROV's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as RBKB (100). This means that PROV’s stock grew similarly to RBKB’s over the last 12 months.
PROV's SMR Rating (60) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as RBKB (65). This means that PROV’s stock grew similarly to RBKB’s over the last 12 months.
PROV's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as RBKB (44). This means that PROV’s stock grew similarly to RBKB’s over the last 12 months.
RBKB's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as PROV (24). This means that RBKB’s stock grew similarly to PROV’s over the last 12 months.
RSI ODDS (%) |
Stochastic ODDS (%) |
Momentum ODDS (%) |
MACD ODDS (%) |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
Advances ODDS (%) |
Declines ODDS (%) |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
Aroon ODDS (%) |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PROV has been loosely correlated with FFIC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PROV jumps, then FFIC could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PROV | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
PROV | 100% | +0.57% | ||
FFIC - PROV | 36% Loosely correlated | -1.11% | ||
RNST - PROV | 33% Poorly correlated | -1.04% | ||
MNSB - PROV | 33% Poorly correlated | +0.28% | ||
FSBC - PROV | 31% Poorly correlated | -0.12% | ||
UMBF - PROV | 29% Poorly correlated | -1.60% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that RBKB and PBLOF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RBKB and PBLOF's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RBKB | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
RBKB | 100% | +1.37% | ||
PBLOF - RBKB | 25% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
SSBI - RBKB | 25% Poorly correlated | +0.47% | ||
PROV - RBKB | 25% Poorly correlated | +0.57% | ||
TCBS - RBKB | 25% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
BHB - RBKB | 24% Poorly correlated | -2.21% | ||
More |