Advertisement
PROSF vs RTMVF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PROSF is a Hold and RTMVF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PROSF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRTMVF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- PROSF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- RTMVF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PROSF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RTMVF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- PROSF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- RTMVF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
Price Growth
PROSF (@Internet Software/Services) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while RTMVF (@Internet Software/Services) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Software/Services industry was +0.62%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +26.04%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Internet Software/Services (+0.62% weekly)Companies in this industry typically license software on a subscription basis and it is centrally hosted. Such products usually go by the names web-based software, on-demand software and hosted software. Cloud computing has emerged as a major force in this space, making it possible to save files to a remote database (without requiring them to be saved on local storage device); as long as a device has access to the web, it can access the data and the software programs to run it. This has in many cases facilitated cost efficiency, speed and security of data for businesses and consumers. Alphabet Inc., Facebook, Inc. and Yahoo! Inc. are some well-known names in the internet software/services industry.
| PROSF | RTMVF | PROSF / RTMVF | |
| Capitalization | 137B | 7.63B | 1,796% |
| EBITDA | 8.69B | 280M | 3,104% |
| Gain YTD | 45.578 | 25.151 | 181% |
| P/E Ratio | 11.72 | 29.15 | 40% |
| Revenue | 5.87B | 409M | 1,436% |
| Total Cash | 18.3B | 42.4M | 43,160% |
| Total Debt | 16.6B | 5.41M | 306,782% |
PROSF | RTMVF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 34 | 97 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 25 Undervalued | 23 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 70 | 65 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 20 | 9 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 42 | 43 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 71 | 20 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
RTMVF's Valuation (23) in the null industry is in the same range as PROSF (25). This means that RTMVF’s stock grew similarly to PROSF’s over the last 12 months.
RTMVF's Profit vs Risk Rating (65) in the null industry is in the same range as PROSF (70). This means that RTMVF’s stock grew similarly to PROSF’s over the last 12 months.
RTMVF's SMR Rating (9) in the null industry is in the same range as PROSF (20). This means that RTMVF’s stock grew similarly to PROSF’s over the last 12 months.
PROSF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as RTMVF (43). This means that PROSF’s stock grew similarly to RTMVF’s over the last 12 months.
RTMVF's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PROSF (71). This means that RTMVF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PROSF’s over the last 12 months.
| PROSF | RTMVF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 22% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 33% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 20% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 27% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 19% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 67% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | about 1 month ago 66% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | N/A |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| XMMO | 133.24 | 1.87 | +1.42% |
| Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF | |||
| SOXQ | 44.65 | 0.57 | +1.29% |
| Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF | |||
| PRXG | 34.63 | 0.32 | +0.95% |
| Praxis Impact Large Cap Growth ETF | |||
| MDST | 26.69 | 0.06 | +0.23% |
| Westwood Salient Enhanced Mid Inc ETF | |||
| LALT | 22.24 | -0.15 | -0.65% |
| First Trust Multi-Strat Alt ETF | |||
PROSF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that PROSF and TCEHY have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PROSF and TCEHY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PROSF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PROSF | 100% | N/A | ||
| TCEHY - PROSF | 24% Poorly correlated | -1.14% | ||
| TCTZF - PROSF | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.88% | ||
| RTMVF - PROSF | 7% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| NXCLF - PROSF | 5% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| QQQFF - PROSF | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
RTMVF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that RTMVF and GRPN have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RTMVF and GRPN's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RTMVF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RTMVF | 100% | N/A | ||
| GRPN - RTMVF | 28% Poorly correlated | -4.82% | ||
| THRY - RTMVF | 10% Poorly correlated | -0.08% | ||
| RCRRF - RTMVF | 7% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| PROSF - RTMVF | 7% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| TCTZF - RTMVF | 7% Poorly correlated | -0.88% | ||
More | ||||