PROBF
Price
$1.58
Change
-$0.09 (-5.39%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
204.84M
SMAGF
Price
$0.86
Change
-$0.04 (-4.44%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
39.28M
Interact to see
Advertisement

PROBF vs SMAGF

Header iconPROBF vs SMAGF Comparison
Open Charts PROBF vs SMAGFBanner chart's image
PROBE GOLD
Price$1.58
Change-$0.09 (-5.39%)
Volume$61.48K
Capitalization204.84M
Soma Gold
Price$0.86
Change-$0.04 (-4.44%)
Volume$13.5K
Capitalization39.28M
PROBF vs SMAGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PROBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMAGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PROBF vs. SMAGF commentary
Jun 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PROBF is a Hold and SMAGF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 29, 2025
Stock price -- (PROBF: $1.58 vs. SMAGF: $0.86)
Brand notoriety: PROBF and SMAGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PROBF: 144% vs. SMAGF: 31%
Market capitalization -- PROBF: $204.84M vs. SMAGF: $39.28M
PROBF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $204.84M. SMAGF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $39.28M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PROBF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSMAGF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • PROBF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SMAGF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SMAGF is a better buy in the long-term than PROBF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PROBF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SMAGF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PROBF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SMAGF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PROBF is a better buy in the short-term than SMAGF.

Price Growth

PROBF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -7.06% price change this week, while SMAGF (@Precious Metals) price change was -5.95% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.26%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.06% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PROBF($205M) has a higher market cap than SMAGF($39.3M). SMAGF YTD gains are higher at: 131.761 vs. PROBF (31.667). SMAGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 16.8M vs. PROBF (-26.72M). PROBF has more cash in the bank: 34.5M vs. SMAGF (680K). PROBF has less debt than SMAGF: PROBF (564K) vs SMAGF (29.6M). SMAGF has higher revenues than PROBF: SMAGF (50.3M) vs PROBF (0).
PROBFSMAGFPROBF / SMAGF
Capitalization205M39.3M522%
EBITDA-26.72M16.8M-159%
Gain YTD31.667131.76124%
P/E RatioN/A625.00-
Revenue050.3M-
Total Cash34.5M680K5,074%
Total Debt564K29.6M2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PROBF vs SMAGF: Fundamental Ratings
PROBF
SMAGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
83
Overvalued
68
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5714
SMR RATING
1..100
9923
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4435
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10092
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a95

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SMAGF's Valuation (68) in the null industry is in the same range as PROBF (83). This means that SMAGF’s stock grew similarly to PROBF’s over the last 12 months.

SMAGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PROBF (57). This means that SMAGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PROBF’s over the last 12 months.

SMAGF's SMR Rating (23) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PROBF (99). This means that SMAGF’s stock grew significantly faster than PROBF’s over the last 12 months.

SMAGF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as PROBF (44). This means that SMAGF’s stock grew similarly to PROBF’s over the last 12 months.

SMAGF's P/E Growth Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as PROBF (100). This means that SMAGF’s stock grew similarly to PROBF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PROBFSMAGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PROBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMAGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PONGF0.220.03
+18.42%
Atari
VLEEF11.320.47
+4.33%
Valeo SE
ASHTF64.502.50
+4.03%
Ashtead Group PLC
SUCEF26.05N/A
N/A
Sumitomo Osaka Cement Co., Ltd.
QWTR0.03N/A
N/A
Quest Water Global, Inc.

PROBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PROBF has been loosely correlated with TORXF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PROBF jumps, then TORXF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PROBF
1D Price
Change %
PROBF100%
-5.95%
TORXF - PROBF
34%
Loosely correlated
-3.97%
SNWGF - PROBF
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.52%
ELEMF - PROBF
28%
Poorly correlated
+5.98%
SMAGF - PROBF
28%
Poorly correlated
-4.21%
WRLGF - PROBF
27%
Poorly correlated
-2.53%
More

SMAGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMAGF has been loosely correlated with TORXF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SMAGF jumps, then TORXF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMAGF
1D Price
Change %
SMAGF100%
-4.21%
TORXF - SMAGF
35%
Loosely correlated
-3.97%
STLRF - SMAGF
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.31%
PROBF - SMAGF
28%
Poorly correlated
-5.95%
LOMLF - SMAGF
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.15%
IMPUY - SMAGF
27%
Poorly correlated
-5.47%
More