PROBF
Price
$1.67
Change
+$0.02 (+1.21%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
340.08M
RDEXF
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
18.09M
Interact to see
Advertisement

PROBF vs RDEXF

Header iconPROBF vs RDEXF Comparison
Open Charts PROBF vs RDEXFBanner chart's image
PROBE GOLD
Price$1.67
Change+$0.02 (+1.21%)
Volume$35.55K
Capitalization340.08M
Red Pine Exploration
Price$0.06
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$47.5K
Capitalization18.09M
PROBF vs RDEXF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PROBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RDEXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PROBF vs. RDEXF commentary
Aug 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PROBF is a Hold and RDEXF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 11, 2025
Stock price -- (PROBF: $1.67 vs. RDEXF: $0.06)
Brand notoriety: PROBF and RDEXF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PROBF: 114% vs. RDEXF: 10%
Market capitalization -- PROBF: $340.08M vs. RDEXF: $18.09M
PROBF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $340.08M. RDEXF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $18.09M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $76.48B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.45B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PROBF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRDEXF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • PROBF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RDEXF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, PROBF is a better buy in the long-term than RDEXF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PROBF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RDEXF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PROBF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • RDEXF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RDEXF is a better buy in the short-term than PROBF.

Price Growth

PROBF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +6.51% price change this week, while RDEXF (@Precious Metals) price change was +1.72% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +19.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4669.58%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+19.60% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PROBF($340M) has a higher market cap than RDEXF($18.1M). PROBF YTD gains are higher at: 39.167 vs. RDEXF (-24.226). PROBF has more cash in the bank: 11.6M vs. RDEXF (4.45M). RDEXF has less debt than PROBF: RDEXF (191K) vs PROBF (391K).
PROBFRDEXFPROBF / RDEXF
Capitalization340M18.1M1,878%
EBITDA-29.3MN/A-
Gain YTD39.167-24.226-162%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue0N/A-
Total Cash11.6M4.45M260%
Total Debt391K191K205%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PROBF vs RDEXF: Fundamental Ratings
PROBF
RDEXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
84
Overvalued
87
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
54100
SMR RATING
1..100
99100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4164
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PROBF's Valuation (84) in the null industry is in the same range as RDEXF (87). This means that PROBF’s stock grew similarly to RDEXF’s over the last 12 months.

PROBF's Profit vs Risk Rating (54) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RDEXF (100). This means that PROBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RDEXF’s over the last 12 months.

PROBF's SMR Rating (99) in the null industry is in the same range as RDEXF (100). This means that PROBF’s stock grew similarly to RDEXF’s over the last 12 months.

PROBF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as RDEXF (64). This means that PROBF’s stock grew similarly to RDEXF’s over the last 12 months.

PROBF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as RDEXF (100). This means that PROBF’s stock grew similarly to RDEXF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PROBFRDEXF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PROBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RDEXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BRAGX106.270.86
+0.82%
Bridgeway Aggressive Investors 1
FSEPX14.040.10
+0.72%
Fidelity Advisor Sustainable U.S. Eq M
BIGRX37.800.25
+0.67%
American Century Discplnd Cor Val Inv
NRERX13.45-0.12
-0.88%
Neuberger Berman Real Estate R3
CSEIX16.20-0.18
-1.10%
Cohen & Steers Real Estate Securities A

PROBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PROBF has been loosely correlated with TORXF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PROBF jumps, then TORXF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PROBF
1D Price
Change %
PROBF100%
+1.21%
TORXF - PROBF
34%
Loosely correlated
-1.19%
SNWGF - PROBF
28%
Poorly correlated
-3.23%
ELEMF - PROBF
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.41%
SMAGF - PROBF
28%
Poorly correlated
+5.40%
WRLGF - PROBF
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.95%
More

RDEXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RDEXF and NSVLF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RDEXF and NSVLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RDEXF
1D Price
Change %
RDEXF100%
+4.68%
NSVLF - RDEXF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BLTMF - RDEXF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PROBF - RDEXF
5%
Poorly correlated
+1.21%
PREIF - RDEXF
4%
Poorly correlated
+1.01%
RGRNF - RDEXF
4%
Poorly correlated
-5.21%
More