PROBF
Price
$2.60
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 2 closing price
Capitalization
530.04M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
RCGCF
Price
$0.10
Change
+$0.01 (+11.11%)
Updated
Dec 2 closing price
Capitalization
40.8M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

PROBF vs RCGCF

Header iconPROBF vs RCGCF Comparison
Open Charts PROBF vs RCGCFBanner chart's image
PROBE GOLD
Price$2.60
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$33.22K
Capitalization530.04M
ROSCAN GOLD
Price$0.10
Change+$0.01 (+11.11%)
Volume$347.63K
Capitalization40.8M
PROBF vs RCGCF Comparison Chart in %
PROBF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RCGCF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PROBF vs. RCGCF commentary
Dec 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PROBF is a Buy and RCGCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 04, 2025
Stock price -- (PROBF: $2.60 vs. RCGCF: $0.09)
Brand notoriety: PROBF and RCGCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PROBF: 43% vs. RCGCF: 74%
Market capitalization -- PROBF: $530.04M vs. RCGCF: $43.94M
PROBF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $530.04M. RCGCF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $43.94M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $112.48B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.58B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PROBF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRCGCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • PROBF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RCGCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, PROBF is a better buy in the long-term than RCGCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PROBF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RCGCF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PROBF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • RCGCF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both PROBF and RCGCF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

PROBF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +0.97% price change this week, while RCGCF (@Precious Metals) price change was +18.31% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +3.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +64.10%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+3.71% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PROBF($530M) has a higher market cap than RCGCF($40.8M). RCGCF (122.482) and PROBF (116.667) have similar YTD gains . RCGCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.4M vs. PROBF (-21.68M). PROBF has more cash in the bank: 47.8M vs. RCGCF (949K). PROBF has less debt than RCGCF: PROBF (364K) vs RCGCF (1.77M). PROBF (0) and RCGCF (0) have equivalent revenues.
PROBFRCGCFPROBF / RCGCF
Capitalization530M40.8M1,299%
EBITDA-21.68M-2.4M902%
Gain YTD116.667122.48295%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash47.8M949K5,037%
Total Debt364K1.77M21%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PROBF vs RCGCF: Fundamental Ratings
PROBF
RCGCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
74
Overvalued
84
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
37100
SMR RATING
1..100
98100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3638
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PROBF's Valuation (74) in the null industry is in the same range as RCGCF (84). This means that PROBF’s stock grew similarly to RCGCF’s over the last 12 months.

PROBF's Profit vs Risk Rating (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RCGCF (100). This means that PROBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RCGCF’s over the last 12 months.

PROBF's SMR Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as RCGCF (100). This means that PROBF’s stock grew similarly to RCGCF’s over the last 12 months.

PROBF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as RCGCF (38). This means that PROBF’s stock grew similarly to RCGCF’s over the last 12 months.

PROBF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as RCGCF (100). This means that PROBF’s stock grew similarly to RCGCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PROBFRCGCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
87%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PROBF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RCGCF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BEVFF2.61N/A
N/A
Diversified Royalty Corp.
DMGGF0.20N/A
N/A
DMG Blockchain Solutions Inc.
IFPJF12.85N/A
N/A
Informa Plc.
OILCF1.70N/A
N/A
Permex Petroleum Corporation
PMMAF24.07N/A
N/A
Puma AG Rudolf Dassler Sport

PROBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PROBF and THM have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PROBF and THM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PROBF
1D Price
Change %
PROBF100%
N/A
THM - PROBF
32%
Poorly correlated
-4.38%
NFGC - PROBF
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.88%
TORXF - PROBF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BTG - PROBF
30%
Poorly correlated
-3.59%
KGC - PROBF
30%
Poorly correlated
-3.00%
More

RCGCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RCGCF and PNCKF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RCGCF and PNCKF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RCGCF
1D Price
Change %
RCGCF100%
N/A
PNCKF - RCGCF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TORXF - RCGCF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RDUFF - RCGCF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RDEXF - RCGCF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PROBF - RCGCF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More