Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PRMSX vs RNWBX
PRMSX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts PRMSX vs RNWBX
T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Stock
Price$44.11
Change+$0.10 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.82B
American Funds New World R2
Price$88.71
Change+$0.03 (+0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.3B
PRMSX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PRMSX vs. RNWBX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRMSX is a Buy and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 75.3B vs. PRMSX (5.82B). PRMSX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: PRMSX (0.27) vs RNWBX (0.12). PRMSX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: PRMSX (31 years) vs RNWBX (24 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than PRMSX (1.22). PRMSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.10 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRMSX: RNWBX (250) vs PRMSX (2500). PRMSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.71 vs. RNWBX (18.68). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 7.66 vs. PRMSX (-15.38).
| PRMSX | RNWBX | PRMSX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.67 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.67 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 30.041 | 20.612 | 146% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.82B | 75.3B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.27 | 0.12 | 232% |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.71 | 18.68 | 148% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.35 | 40.84 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.38 | 7.66 | -201% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.68 | 83.29 | 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers