PRLPF
Price
$21.72
Change
-$0.68 (-3.04%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
846.04M
SEZL
Price
$84.19
Change
-$0.08 (-0.09%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
2.86B
39 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

PRLPF vs SEZL

Header iconPRLPF vs SEZL Comparison
Open Charts PRLPF vs SEZLBanner chart's image
PROPEL
Price$21.72
Change-$0.68 (-3.04%)
Volume$10.78K
Capitalization846.04M
Sezzle
Price$84.19
Change-$0.08 (-0.09%)
Volume$400.54K
Capitalization2.86B
PRLPF vs SEZL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PRLPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SEZL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PRLPF vs. SEZL commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRLPF is a Hold and SEZL is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (PRLPF: $21.72 vs. SEZL: $84.19)
Brand notoriety: PRLPF and SEZL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Savings Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PRLPF: 147% vs. SEZL: 38%
Market capitalization -- PRLPF: $846.04M vs. SEZL: $2.86B
PRLPF [@Savings Banks] is valued at $846.04M. SEZL’s [@Savings Banks] market capitalization is $2.86B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Savings Banks] industry ranges from $654.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Savings Banks] industry is $21.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PRLPF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSEZL’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • PRLPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SEZL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SEZL is a better buy in the long-term than PRLPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PRLPF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SEZL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PRLPF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SEZL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PRLPF is a better buy in the short-term than SEZL.

Price Growth

PRLPF (@Savings Banks) experienced а -11.81% price change this week, while SEZL (@Savings Banks) price change was -8.09% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was -2.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.10%, and the average quarterly price growth was +37.56%.

Reported Earning Dates

SEZL is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Savings Banks (-2.19% weekly)

A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SEZL($2.86B) has a higher market cap than PRLPF($846M). SEZL has higher P/E ratio than PRLPF: SEZL (28.65) vs PRLPF (14.68). SEZL YTD gains are higher at: 97.474 vs. PRLPF (-10.422). SEZL has less debt than PRLPF: SEZL (131M) vs PRLPF (290M). PRLPF has higher revenues than SEZL: PRLPF (494M) vs SEZL (372M).
PRLPFSEZLPRLPF / SEZL
Capitalization846M2.86B30%
EBITDAN/A139M-
Gain YTD-10.42297.474-11%
P/E Ratio14.6828.6551%
Revenue494M372M133%
Total CashN/A88.9M-
Total Debt290M131M221%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PRLPFSEZL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PRLPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SEZL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JVSCX15.020.16
+1.08%
Janus Henderson Small-Mid Cap Value C
VDSYX25.720.17
+0.67%
Victory Diversified Stock Y
RSESX18.380.11
+0.60%
Russell Inv US Strategic Equity S
CBFEX40.760.18
+0.44%
American Funds Global Balanced 529E
KLGNX53.690.17
+0.32%
NYLI WMC Growth Investor Class

PRLPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PRLPF and AIJTY have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PRLPF and AIJTY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PRLPF
1D Price
Change %
PRLPF100%
-3.02%
AIJTY - PRLPF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VSTS - PRLPF
4%
Poorly correlated
+3.33%
MWG - PRLPF
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.17%
SEZL - PRLPF
-1%
Poorly correlated
-0.09%
AIFLF - PRLPF
-4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SEZL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SEZL has been loosely correlated with UPST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SEZL jumps, then UPST could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SEZL
1D Price
Change %
SEZL100%
-0.09%
UPST - SEZL
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.74%
SOFI - SEZL
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.50%
PMTS - SEZL
46%
Loosely correlated
+3.28%
URI - SEZL
44%
Loosely correlated
+1.72%
OMF - SEZL
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.41%
More