Advertisement
PRKWF vs RFNDF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRKWF is a Hold and RFNDF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PRKWF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRFNDF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- PRKWF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- RFNDF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PRKWF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RFNDF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- PRKWF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- RFNDF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
PRKWF (@Managed Health Care) experienced а +1.91% price change this week, while RFNDF (@Specialty Telecommunications) price change was +2.28% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Managed Health Care industry was +0.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.56%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Telecommunications industry was +0.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.88%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Managed Health Care (+0.35% weekly)Managed healthcare industry focuses on providing health/medical and disability insurance plans, generally intended to reduce the cost of for-profit health care. The insurance products might be provided through employer-paid (fully or partly) insurance and benefit programs, or through Medicare/Medicaid. Some of the largest providers of managed health care include Aetna, Humana Inc., and Cigna, and UnitedHealthcare.
@Specialty Telecommunications (+0.31% weekly)Companies belonging to the specialty telecommunications sector provide voice and data transmission via a single method, such as fixed lines, digital subscriber lines (DSL), wireless technology, the internet or competitive local exchange carriers. Telefonica, Liberty Broadband Corp., and Zayo Group Holdings, Inc. are some of the big specialty telecom companies in the U.S.
| PRKWF | RFNDF | PRKWF / RFNDF | |
| Capitalization | 2.06B | 493M | 418% |
| EBITDA | 114M | 88.7M | 129% |
| Gain YTD | 25.490 | 27.850 | 92% |
| P/E Ratio | 31.12 | 15.51 | 201% |
| Revenue | 145M | 104M | 139% |
| Total Cash | 29.5M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 886M | N/A | - |
PRKWF | RFNDF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 8 Undervalued | 20 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 65 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 84 | 86 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 53 | 42 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 18 | 12 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PRKWF's Valuation (8) in the null industry is in the same range as RFNDF (20). This means that PRKWF’s stock grew similarly to RFNDF’s over the last 12 months.
PRKWF's Profit vs Risk Rating (65) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RFNDF (100). This means that PRKWF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RFNDF’s over the last 12 months.
PRKWF's SMR Rating (84) in the null industry is in the same range as RFNDF (86). This means that PRKWF’s stock grew similarly to RFNDF’s over the last 12 months.
RFNDF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as PRKWF (53). This means that RFNDF’s stock grew similarly to PRKWF’s over the last 12 months.
RFNDF's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the null industry is in the same range as PRKWF (18). This means that RFNDF’s stock grew similarly to PRKWF’s over the last 12 months.
| PRKWF | RFNDF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 61% | 4 days ago 47% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 61% | 4 days ago 41% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 47% | 4 days ago 38% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 39% | 4 days ago 38% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 44% | 4 days ago 32% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 44% | 4 days ago 26% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 29% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 19 days ago 20% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 51% | 4 days ago 48% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| RREYX | 29.98 | 0.08 | +0.27% |
| Russell Inv Global Real Estate Secs Y | |||
| DSHFX | 12.52 | -0.03 | -0.24% |
| Brinker Capital Destinations Shelter I | |||
| TEQWX | 45.12 | -0.12 | -0.27% |
| Nuveen Equity Index W | |||
| DLCZX | 11.93 | -0.04 | -0.33% |
| Destinations Large Cap Equity Z | |||
| OSPAX | 9.14 | -0.04 | -0.44% |
| Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha R6 | |||
PRKWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PRKWF has been loosely correlated with NTSGF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PRKWF jumps, then NTSGF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PRKWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRKWF | 100% | N/A | ||
| NTSGF - PRKWF | 33% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| FRZCF - PRKWF | 32% Poorly correlated | -5.88% | ||
| NRWRF - PRKWF | 32% Poorly correlated | +1.52% | ||
| CPAMF - PRKWF | 26% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| MAPGF - PRKWF | 25% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
RFNDF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that RFNDF and PAZRF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RFNDF and PAZRF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RFNDF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RFNDF | 100% | N/A | ||
| PAZRF - RFNDF | 27% Poorly correlated | +0.13% | ||
| EFRTF - RFNDF | 24% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| BYLOF - RFNDF | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.34% | ||
| SEGXF - RFNDF | 12% Poorly correlated | +1.72% | ||
| PRKWF - RFNDF | 9% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||