Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PRGTX vs RINCX
PRGTX vs RINCX Comparison
Open Charts PRGTX vs RINCX
T. Rowe Price Global Technology
Price$26.08
Change-$0.85 (-3.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.72B
Victory RS Science and Technology C
Price$20.20
Change-$1.26 (-5.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets226.11M
PRGTX vs RINCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
A.I.Advisor
published Highlights
Market Cap
The average market capitalization across the group is 2.97B. The market cap for tickers in the group ranges from 225.82M to 5.72B. PRGTX holds the highest valuation in this group at 5.72B. The lowest valued company is RINCX at 225.82M.
High and low price notable news
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the group was 1%. For the same group, the average monthly price growth was 1%, and the average quarterly price growth was 24%. PRGTX experienced the highest price growth at 1%, while RINCX experienced the biggest fall at 1%.
Volume
The average weekly volume growth across all stocks in the group was 0%. For the same stocks of the group, the average monthly volume growth was 0% and the average quarterly volume growth was 0%
Fundamental Analysis Ratings
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
Valuation Rating:
P/E Growth Rating:
Price Growth Rating:
SMR Rating:
Profit Risk Rating:
Seasonality Score: (-100 ... +100)
PRGTX vs. RINCX commentary
Dec 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRGTX is a Hold and RINCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PRGTX has more cash in the bank: 5.72B vs. RINCX (226M). PRGTX (0.00) and RINCX (0.00) have matching dividends . PRGTX was incepted earlier than RINCX: PRGTX (25 years) vs RINCX (19 years). RINCX (2.57) is less costly to investors than PRGTX (0.92). RINCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. PRGTX (31.40). PRGTX (2500) and RINCX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PRGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.31 vs. RINCX (14.03). PRGTX return over 5 years is better than : -2.99 vs. RINCX (-22.89).
| PRGTX | RINCX | PRGTX / RINCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 2.28 | 40% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 2.57 | 36% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 29.099 | 21.724 | 134% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.72B | 226M | 2,530% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.31 | 14.03 | 180% |
| Returns for 3 years | 141.09 | 88.91 | 159% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.99 | -22.89 | 13% |
| Returns for 10 years | 85.60 | 27.81 | 308% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| CWSIX | 15.44 | 0.11 | +0.72% |
| Carillon Chartwell Small Cap Value I | |||
| JNUSX | 20.61 | 0.13 | +0.63% |
| JPMorgan Developed International Value L | |||
| MIGFX | 46.19 | 0.19 | +0.41% |
| MFS Massachusetts Inv Gr Stk A | |||
| REMCX | 19.06 | N/A | N/A |
| Russell Inv Emerging Markets C | |||
| MVGLX | 18.81 | N/A | N/A |
| MFS Low Volatility Global Equity R3 | |||