Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PRGTX vs RCGTX
PRGTX vs RCGTX Comparison
Open Charts PRGTX vs RCGTX
T. Rowe Price Global Technology
Price$26.76
Change-$0.30 (-1.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.66B
Virtus Zevenbergen Technology C
Price$13.83
Change-$3.41 (-19.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.66B
PRGTX vs RCGTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PRGTX vs. RCGTX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRGTX is a Hold and RCGTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PRGTX has more cash in the bank: 5.66B vs. RCGTX (1.66B). PRGTX (0.00) and RCGTX (0.00) have matching dividends . PRGTX was incepted earlier than RCGTX: PRGTX (25 years) vs RCGTX (24 years). RCGTX (2.17) is less costly to investors than PRGTX (0.92). PRGTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.40 vs. RCGTX (2.00). PRGTX (2500) and RCGTX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PRGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.66 vs. RCGTX (-0.79). PRGTX return over 5 years is better than : -10.86 vs. RCGTX (-69.96).
| PRGTX | RCGTX | PRGTX / RCGTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 2.17 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 2.17 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.791 | -2.399 | -33% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.66B | 1.66B | 341% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.66 | -0.79 | -3,886% |
| Returns for 3 years | 123.00 | 87.14 | 141% |
| Returns for 5 years | -10.86 | -69.96 | 16% |
| Returns for 10 years | 143.49 | -62.17 | -231% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement