Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PRGTX vs RCGTX
PRGTX vs RCGTX Comparison
Open Charts PRGTX vs RCGTX
T. Rowe Price Global Technology
Price$23.12
Change+$0.23 (+1.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.89B
Virtus Zevenbergen Technology C
Price$15.00
Change+$0.21 (+1.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.54B
PRGTX vs RCGTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PRGTX vs. RCGTX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRGTX is a StrongBuy and RCGTX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PRGTX has more cash in the bank: 4.89B vs. RCGTX (1.54B). PRGTX (0.00) and RCGTX (0.00) have matching dividends . PRGTX was incepted earlier than RCGTX: PRGTX (25 years) vs RCGTX (23 years). RCGTX (2.17) is less costly to investors than PRGTX (0.92). PRGTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.40 vs. RCGTX (23.00). PRGTX (2500) and RCGTX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RCGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.12 vs. PRGTX (13.72). PRGTX return over 5 years is better than : 9.68 vs. RCGTX (-66.50).
| PRGTX | RCGTX | PRGTX / RCGTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 2.17 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 2.17 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.834 | 9.489 | 114% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.89B | 1.54B | 317% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.72 | 15.12 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 93.96 | -2.28 | -4,121% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.68 | -66.50 | -15% |
| Returns for 10 years | 75.28 | -69.87 | -108% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement