Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PRGTX vs RCGTX
PRGTX vs RCGTX Comparison
Open Charts PRGTX vs RCGTX
T. Rowe Price Global Technology
Price$21.38
Change-$0.36 (-1.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.54B
Virtus Zevenbergen Technology C
Price$14.01
Change-$0.19 (-1.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.5B
PRGTX vs RCGTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PRGTX vs. RCGTX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRGTX is a StrongBuy and RCGTX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PRGTX has more cash in the bank: 4.54B vs. RCGTX (1.5B). PRGTX (0.00) and RCGTX (0.00) have matching dividends . PRGTX was incepted earlier than RCGTX: PRGTX (25 years) vs RCGTX (23 years). RCGTX (2.17) is less costly to investors than PRGTX (0.92). PRGTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.40 vs. RCGTX (23.00). PRGTX (2500) and RCGTX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RCGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.21 vs. PRGTX (10.66). PRGTX return over 5 years is better than : 11.64 vs. RCGTX (-65.74).
| PRGTX | RCGTX | PRGTX / RCGTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 2.17 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 2.17 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.493 | 2.263 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.54B | 1.5B | 303% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.66 | 15.21 | 70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 90.38 | -8.43 | -1,072% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.64 | -65.74 | -18% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.09 | -72.75 | -78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement