Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PRGTX vs RCGTX
PRGTX vs RCGTX Comparison
Open Charts PRGTX vs RCGTX
T. Rowe Price Global Technology
Price$24.69
Change+$0.08 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.35B
Virtus Zevenbergen Technology C
Price$15.76
Change+$0.06 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.6B
PRGTX vs RCGTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PRGTX vs. RCGTX commentary
Aug 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRGTX is a Buy and RCGTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PRGTX has more cash in the bank: 5.35B vs. RCGTX (1.6B). PRGTX (0.00) and RCGTX (0.00) have matching dividends . PRGTX was incepted earlier than RCGTX: PRGTX (25 years) vs RCGTX (24 years). RCGTX (2.17) is less costly to investors than PRGTX (0.92). PRGTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.40 vs. RCGTX (23.00). PRGTX (2500) and RCGTX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RCGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.61 vs. PRGTX (25.71). PRGTX return over 5 years is better than : 9.34 vs. RCGTX (-67.42).
| PRGTX | RCGTX | PRGTX / RCGTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 2.17 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 2.17 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.360 | 15.036 | 122% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.35B | 1.6B | 334% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.71 | 27.61 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 80.88 | -10.30 | -785% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.34 | -67.42 | -14% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.41 | -65.51 | -144% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement