PREIF
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
8.06M
STBMF
Price
$0.23
Change
+$0.06 (+35.29%)
Updated
Aug 25 closing price
Capitalization
280.66M
Interact to see
Advertisement

PREIF vs STBMF

Header iconPREIF vs STBMF Comparison
Open Charts PREIF vs STBMFBanner chart's image
Precipitate Gold
Price$0.06
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$54.43K
Capitalization8.06M
St. Barbara
Price$0.23
Change+$0.06 (+35.29%)
Volume$5K
Capitalization280.66M
PREIF vs STBMF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PREIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
STBMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PREIF vs. STBMF commentary
Sep 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PREIF is a Hold and STBMF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 04, 2025
Stock price -- (PREIF: $0.06 vs. STBMF: $0.23)
Brand notoriety: PREIF and STBMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PREIF: 74% vs. STBMF: 209%
Market capitalization -- PREIF: $8.06M vs. STBMF: $280.66M
PREIF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $8.06M. STBMF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $280.66M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $93.2B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PREIF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSTBMF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • PREIF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • STBMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, STBMF is a better buy in the long-term than PREIF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PREIF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while STBMF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PREIF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • STBMF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, STBMF is a better buy in the short-term than PREIF.

Price Growth

PREIF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -4.45% price change this week, while STBMF (@Precious Metals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +7.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +33.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4896.28%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+7.75% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
STBMF($281M) has a higher market cap than PREIF($8.06M). STBMF YTD gains are higher at: 120.307 vs. PREIF (39.864).
PREIFSTBMFPREIF / STBMF
Capitalization8.06M281M3%
EBITDA-1.19MN/A-
Gain YTD39.864120.30733%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue0N/A-
Total Cash4.13MN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PREIF vs STBMF: Fundamental Ratings
PREIF
STBMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5640
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
57
Fair valued
7
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9595
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6439
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1096
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

STBMF's Valuation (7) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PREIF (57). This means that STBMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PREIF’s over the last 12 months.

STBMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as PREIF (100). This means that STBMF’s stock grew similarly to PREIF’s over the last 12 months.

STBMF's SMR Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as PREIF (95). This means that STBMF’s stock grew similarly to PREIF’s over the last 12 months.

STBMF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as PREIF (64). This means that STBMF’s stock grew similarly to PREIF’s over the last 12 months.

PREIF's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for STBMF (96). This means that PREIF’s stock grew significantly faster than STBMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PREIFSTBMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
46%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
76%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
90%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PREIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
STBMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DQIYX34.460.16
+0.47%
BNY Mellon Equity Income Fund Y
SCNUX11.780.05
+0.43%
Invesco Income Advantage U.S. Fund Inv
CCSGX25.76-0.03
-0.12%
Conestoga SMid Cap Institutional
TEMTX26.67-0.07
-0.26%
Franklin Mutual Shares C
DTSVX27.06-0.09
-0.33%
Wilshire Small Company Value Invmt

PREIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PREIF and STBMF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PREIF and STBMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PREIF
1D Price
Change %
PREIF100%
+5.50%
STBMF - PREIF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RIOFF - PREIF
12%
Poorly correlated
-1.52%
PROBF - PREIF
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.65%
RDEXF - PREIF
4%
Poorly correlated
+2.35%
RCGCF - PREIF
1%
Poorly correlated
+6.02%
More

STBMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that STBMF and KSSRF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that STBMF and KSSRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To STBMF
1D Price
Change %
STBMF100%
N/A
KSSRF - STBMF
27%
Poorly correlated
+16.39%
ELRRF - STBMF
26%
Poorly correlated
-5.40%
PREIF - STBMF
20%
Poorly correlated
+5.50%
STPGF - STBMF
12%
Poorly correlated
+4.63%
STRRF - STBMF
2%
Poorly correlated
-3.41%
More