PREIF
Price
$0.19
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jan 15 closing price
Capitalization
24.88M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
RCGCF
Price
$0.11
Change
-$0.01 (-8.33%)
Updated
Jan 15 closing price
Capitalization
48.95M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

PREIF vs RCGCF

Header iconPREIF vs RCGCF Comparison
Open Charts PREIF vs RCGCFBanner chart's image
Precipitate Gold
Price$0.19
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$125.36K
Capitalization24.88M
ROSCAN GOLD
Price$0.11
Change-$0.01 (-8.33%)
Volume$87.08K
Capitalization48.95M
PREIF vs RCGCF Comparison Chart in %
PREIF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RCGCF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PREIF vs. RCGCF commentary
Jan 16, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PREIF is a Hold and RCGCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 16, 2026
Stock price -- (PREIF: $0.19 vs. RCGCF: $0.11)
Brand notoriety: PREIF and RCGCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PREIF: 137% vs. RCGCF: 46%
Market capitalization -- PREIF: $24.88M vs. RCGCF: $48.95M
PREIF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $24.88M. RCGCF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $48.95M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $143.7B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $4.38B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PREIF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRCGCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • PREIF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RCGCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, PREIF is a better buy in the long-term than RCGCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PREIF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RCGCF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PREIF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • RCGCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both PREIF and RCGCF are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

PREIF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +14.04% price change this week, while RCGCF (@Precious Metals) price change was -0.27% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +3.04%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +23.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +101.65%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+3.04% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RCGCF($48.9M) has a higher market cap than PREIF($24.9M). PREIF YTD gains are higher at: 42.000 vs. RCGCF (6.041). PREIF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.19M vs. RCGCF (-2.4M). PREIF has more cash in the bank: 4.13M vs. RCGCF (949K). PREIF (0) and RCGCF (0) have equivalent revenues.
PREIFRCGCFPREIF / RCGCF
Capitalization24.9M48.9M51%
EBITDA-1.19M-2.4M49%
Gain YTD42.0006.041695%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash4.13M949K435%
Total DebtN/A1.77M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PREIF vs RCGCF: Fundamental Ratings
PREIF
RCGCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7119
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
63
Fair valued
82
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
96100
SMR RATING
1..100
95100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3436
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5019

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PREIF's Valuation (63) in the null industry is in the same range as RCGCF (82). This means that PREIF’s stock grew similarly to RCGCF’s over the last 12 months.

PREIF's Profit vs Risk Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as RCGCF (100). This means that PREIF’s stock grew similarly to RCGCF’s over the last 12 months.

PREIF's SMR Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as RCGCF (100). This means that PREIF’s stock grew similarly to RCGCF’s over the last 12 months.

PREIF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as RCGCF (36). This means that PREIF’s stock grew similarly to RCGCF’s over the last 12 months.

PREIF's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for RCGCF (100). This means that PREIF’s stock grew significantly faster than RCGCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PREIFRCGCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PREIF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RCGCF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DGNOF0.230.01
+3.91%
Diagnos Inc.
CHBGF0.30N/A
N/A
CHINA BOTON GROUP CO LTD.
GENSY35.56N/A
N/A
Genus Plc
EMCUF12.80N/A
N/A
EMBRACE CHANGE ACQUISITION CORP.
ATZAF90.95-0.29
-0.32%
Aritzia Inc.

PREIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PREIF and EREPF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PREIF and EREPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PREIF
1D Price
Change %
PREIF100%
+2.95%
EREPF - PREIF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
STBMF - PREIF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RCGCF - PREIF
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.10%
RDEXF - PREIF
5%
Poorly correlated
-2.61%
RGRNF - PREIF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

RCGCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RCGCF and PNCKF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RCGCF and PNCKF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RCGCF
1D Price
Change %
RCGCF100%
-0.10%
PNCKF - RCGCF
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.60%
TORXF - RCGCF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.67%
RDUFF - RCGCF
14%
Poorly correlated
+19.00%
RDEXF - RCGCF
12%
Poorly correlated
-2.61%
PROBF - RCGCF
8%
Poorly correlated
-0.29%
More