PRDSF
Price
$6.56
Change
+$0.36 (+5.81%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
18.13B
SWGNF
Price
$35.78
Change
+$0.88 (+2.52%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
16.14B
Interact to see
Advertisement

PRDSF vs SWGNF

Header iconPRDSF vs SWGNF Comparison
Open Charts PRDSF vs SWGNFBanner chart's image
Prada Spa
Price$6.56
Change+$0.36 (+5.81%)
Volume$773
Capitalization18.13B
Swatch Group AG
Price$35.78
Change+$0.88 (+2.52%)
Volume$691
Capitalization16.14B
PRDSF vs SWGNF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PRDSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SWGNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PRDSF vs. SWGNF commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRDSF is a Hold and SWGNF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (PRDSF: $6.56 vs. SWGNF: $35.78)
Brand notoriety: PRDSF and SWGNF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Consumer Specialties industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PRDSF: 6% vs. SWGNF: 46%
Market capitalization -- PRDSF: $18.13B vs. SWGNF: $16.14B
PRDSF [@Other Consumer Specialties] is valued at $18.13B. SWGNF’s [@Other Consumer Specialties] market capitalization is $16.14B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Consumer Specialties] industry ranges from $466.87B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Consumer Specialties] industry is $55.93B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PRDSF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSWGNF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • PRDSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SWGNF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both PRDSF and SWGNF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PRDSF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SWGNF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PRDSF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SWGNF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PRDSF is a better buy in the short-term than SWGNF.

Price Growth

PRDSF (@Other Consumer Specialties) experienced а +8.25% price change this week, while SWGNF (@Other Consumer Specialties) price change was -0.89% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Consumer Specialties industry was +4.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.24%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Consumer Specialties (+4.33% weekly)

‘Other Consumer Specialties’ represents an industry that typically sells durable consumer products, but do not have a classification in another category. The products include jewelry, smoke detectors, watches, collectibles and safety products. MSA Safety (makes products which enhances the safety and health of workers and protect facility infrastructures), Matthews International (memorialization business), Fitbit (makes wireless-enabled wearable technology devices that gauge data such as the number of steps walked, heart rate, quality of sleep), and Fossil Group (makes watches and accessories) have some of the largest market caps in this group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PRDSF($18.1B) has a higher market cap than SWGNF($16.1B). PRDSF has higher P/E ratio than SWGNF: PRDSF (27.47) vs SWGNF (12.33). SWGNF YTD gains are higher at: 2.054 vs. PRDSF (-18.102). SWGNF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.7B vs. PRDSF (1.61B). SWGNF has more cash in the bank: 2.12B vs. PRDSF (784M). SWGNF has less debt than PRDSF: SWGNF (27M) vs PRDSF (2.66B). SWGNF has higher revenues than PRDSF: SWGNF (7.91B) vs PRDSF (4.53B).
PRDSFSWGNFPRDSF / SWGNF
Capitalization18.1B16.1B112%
EBITDA1.61B1.7B95%
Gain YTD-18.1022.054-881%
P/E Ratio27.4712.33223%
Revenue4.53B7.91B57%
Total Cash784M2.12B37%
Total Debt2.66B27M9,867%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PRDSF vs SWGNF: Fundamental Ratings
PRDSF
SWGNF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
35
Fair valued
28
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3993
SMR RATING
1..100
9069
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6157
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
903
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SWGNF's Valuation (28) in the null industry is in the same range as PRDSF (35). This means that SWGNF’s stock grew similarly to PRDSF’s over the last 12 months.

PRDSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (39) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SWGNF (93). This means that PRDSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SWGNF’s over the last 12 months.

SWGNF's SMR Rating (69) in the null industry is in the same range as PRDSF (90). This means that SWGNF’s stock grew similarly to PRDSF’s over the last 12 months.

SWGNF's Price Growth Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as PRDSF (61). This means that SWGNF’s stock grew similarly to PRDSF’s over the last 12 months.

SWGNF's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PRDSF (90). This means that SWGNF’s stock grew significantly faster than PRDSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PRDSFSWGNF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
29%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
41%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
32%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
26%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
35%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
33%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
65%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
31%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
34%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PRDSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SWGNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MLAB98.672.31
+2.40%
Mesa Laboratories
VSEC130.262.53
+1.98%
VSE Corp
FNGR2.05-0.01
-0.49%
FingerMotion
SUZ9.30-0.08
-0.85%
Suzano SA
VEEE2.21-0.02
-0.90%
Twin Vee PowerCats Co

PRDSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PRDSF has been loosely correlated with PRDSY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PRDSF jumps, then PRDSY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PRDSF
1D Price
Change %
PRDSF100%
N/A
PRDSY - PRDSF
36%
Loosely correlated
-2.51%
PPRUY - PRDSF
9%
Poorly correlated
+5.82%
SWGAY - PRDSF
7%
Poorly correlated
+1.94%
SWGNF - PRDSF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SWGAF - PRDSF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SWGNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SWGNF and LKFLF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SWGNF and LKFLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SWGNF
1D Price
Change %
SWGNF100%
N/A
LKFLF - SWGNF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SWGAY - SWGNF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.94%
PPRUY - SWGNF
20%
Poorly correlated
+5.82%
CHDRF - SWGNF
20%
Poorly correlated
-4.70%
WOSGF - SWGNF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More