PRBZF
Price
$65.67
Change
+$2.02 (+3.17%)
Updated
Jul 18 closing price
Capitalization
2.98B
SAPIF
Price
$20.63
Change
+$0.49 (+2.43%)
Updated
Jul 18 closing price
Capitalization
8.86B
Interact to see
Advertisement

PRBZF vs SAPIF

Header iconPRBZF vs SAPIF Comparison
Open Charts PRBZF vs SAPIFBanner chart's image
Premium Brands Holding
Price$65.67
Change+$2.02 (+3.17%)
Volume$25.42K
Capitalization2.98B
Saputo
Price$20.63
Change+$0.49 (+2.43%)
Volume$9.35K
Capitalization8.86B
PRBZF vs SAPIF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PRBZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SAPIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PRBZF vs. SAPIF commentary
Jul 21, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRBZF is a Hold and SAPIF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 21, 2025
Stock price -- (PRBZF: $65.67 vs. SAPIF: $20.63)
Brand notoriety: PRBZF and SAPIF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PRBZF: 339% vs. SAPIF: 21%
Market capitalization -- PRBZF: $2.98B vs. SAPIF: $8.86B
PRBZF [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $2.98B. SAPIF’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $8.86B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.52B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PRBZF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSAPIF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • PRBZF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SAPIF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SAPIF is a better buy in the long-term than PRBZF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PRBZF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SAPIF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PRBZF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SAPIF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PRBZF is a better buy in the short-term than SAPIF.

Price Growth

PRBZF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а +8.25% price change this week, while SAPIF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was -0.12% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was +11.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.03%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (+11.17% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SAPIF($8.86B) has a higher market cap than PRBZF($2.98B). PRBZF has higher P/E ratio than SAPIF: PRBZF (37.77) vs SAPIF (18.90). SAPIF (18.836) and PRBZF (18.666) have similar YTD gains . SAPIF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.46B vs. PRBZF (447M). SAPIF has more cash in the bank: 263M vs. PRBZF (13.8M). PRBZF has less debt than SAPIF: PRBZF (2.39B) vs SAPIF (4.04B). SAPIF has higher revenues than PRBZF: SAPIF (17.8B) vs PRBZF (5.46B).
PRBZFSAPIFPRBZF / SAPIF
Capitalization2.98B8.86B34%
EBITDA447M1.46B31%
Gain YTD18.66618.83699%
P/E Ratio37.7718.90200%
Revenue5.46B17.8B31%
Total Cash13.8M263M5%
Total Debt2.39B4.04B59%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PRBZF vs SAPIF: Fundamental Ratings
PRBZF
SAPIF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8350
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
25
Undervalued
35
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
96100
SMR RATING
1..100
7990
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4549
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7326
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a26

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PRBZF's Valuation (25) in the null industry is in the same range as SAPIF (35). This means that PRBZF’s stock grew similarly to SAPIF’s over the last 12 months.

PRBZF's Profit vs Risk Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as SAPIF (100). This means that PRBZF’s stock grew similarly to SAPIF’s over the last 12 months.

PRBZF's SMR Rating (79) in the null industry is in the same range as SAPIF (90). This means that PRBZF’s stock grew similarly to SAPIF’s over the last 12 months.

PRBZF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as SAPIF (49). This means that PRBZF’s stock grew similarly to SAPIF’s over the last 12 months.

SAPIF's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PRBZF (73). This means that SAPIF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PRBZF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PRBZFSAPIF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
35%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
34%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
49%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
35%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 26 days ago
51%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
23%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
38%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PRBZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SAPIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BRWVX27.210.04
+0.15%
MFS Blended Research Growth Eq R6
FAOOX64.00-0.04
-0.06%
American Funds Invmt Co of Amer 529-F-3
POSKX36.82-0.03
-0.08%
PRIMECAP Odyssey Stock
APDTX25.58-0.02
-0.08%
Artisan Focus Fund Advisor
RTISX11.80-0.02
-0.17%
Russell Inv Multifactor Intl Eq S

PRBZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PRBZF and SGLJF have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PRBZF and SGLJF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PRBZF
1D Price
Change %
PRBZF100%
+3.17%
SGLJF - PRBZF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SAPIF - PRBZF
8%
Poorly correlated
+2.43%
TATYF - PRBZF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PRRFY - PRBZF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SUEZY - PRBZF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SAPIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SAPIF and ASBFY have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SAPIF and ASBFY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SAPIF
1D Price
Change %
SAPIF100%
+2.43%
ASBFY - SAPIF
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.06%
MAMA - SAPIF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.60%
RSGUF - SAPIF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PRBZF - SAPIF
8%
Poorly correlated
+3.17%
TATYF - SAPIF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More