PRA
Price
$23.80
Change
+$0.03 (+0.13%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
650.38M
10 days until earnings call
SAFT
Price
$70.77
Change
+$0.15 (+0.21%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
1.22B
3 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

PRA vs SAFT

Header iconPRA vs SAFT Comparison
Open Charts PRA vs SAFTBanner chart's image
ProAssurance
Price$23.80
Change+$0.03 (+0.13%)
Volume$326.84K
Capitalization650.38M
Safety Insurance Group
Price$70.77
Change+$0.15 (+0.21%)
Volume$46.71K
Capitalization1.22B
PRA vs SAFT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PRA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SAFT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PRA vs. SAFT commentary
Jul 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRA is a Buy and SAFT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 28, 2025
Stock price -- (PRA: $23.80 vs. SAFT: $70.77)
Brand notoriety: PRA and SAFT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PRA: 59% vs. SAFT: 61%
Market capitalization -- PRA: $650.38M vs. SAFT: $1.22B
PRA [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $650.38M. SAFT’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $1.22B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $121.13B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $14.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PRA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSAFT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • PRA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SAFT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PRA is a better buy in the long-term than SAFT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PRA’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SAFT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PRA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SAFT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PRA is a better buy in the short-term than SAFT.

Price Growth

PRA (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а -0.21% price change this week, while SAFT (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was -3.09% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was -0.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.23%.

Reported Earning Dates

PRA is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

SAFT is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (-0.24% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SAFT($1.22B) has a higher market cap than PRA($650M). PRA has higher P/E ratio than SAFT: PRA (105.26) vs SAFT (63.23). PRA YTD gains are higher at: 49.591 vs. SAFT (-12.124). PRA has more cash in the bank: 3.8B vs. SAFT (518M). SAFT has less debt than PRA: SAFT (49.8M) vs PRA (444M). PRA has higher revenues than SAFT: PRA (1.13B) vs SAFT (926M).
PRASAFTPRA / SAFT
Capitalization650M1.22B53%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD49.591-12.124-409%
P/E Ratio105.2663.23166%
Revenue1.13B926M122%
Total Cash3.8B518M733%
Total Debt444M49.8M892%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PRA vs SAFT: Fundamental Ratings
PRA
SAFT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
448
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
96
Overvalued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5672
SMR RATING
1..100
9075
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4080
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1992
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SAFT's Valuation (16) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is significantly better than the same rating for PRA (96) in the Specialty Insurance industry. This means that SAFT’s stock grew significantly faster than PRA’s over the last 12 months.

PRA's Profit vs Risk Rating (56) in the Specialty Insurance industry is in the same range as SAFT (72) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that PRA’s stock grew similarly to SAFT’s over the last 12 months.

SAFT's SMR Rating (75) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as PRA (90) in the Specialty Insurance industry. This means that SAFT’s stock grew similarly to PRA’s over the last 12 months.

PRA's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Specialty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SAFT (80) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that PRA’s stock grew somewhat faster than SAFT’s over the last 12 months.

PRA's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the Specialty Insurance industry is significantly better than the same rating for SAFT (92) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that PRA’s stock grew significantly faster than SAFT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PRASAFT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
56%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PRA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SAFT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CTAGX15.120.19
+1.27%
Calamos Timpani SMID Growth A
LADPX20.490.24
+1.19%
Lord Abbett Developing Growth P
VNVAX24.800.18
+0.73%
Natixis Vaughan Nelson Mid Cap A
ALVOX135.630.59
+0.44%
Alger Capital Appreciation Ptfl I-2
SVALX6.370.01
+0.16%
Federated Hermes Strategic Value Div R6

PRA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PRA has been loosely correlated with UFCS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PRA jumps, then UFCS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PRA
1D Price
Change %
PRA100%
+0.13%
UFCS - PRA
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.04%
SAFT - PRA
33%
Poorly correlated
+0.21%
L - PRA
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.44%
HMN - PRA
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.79%
BNT - PRA
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.86%
More

SAFT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SAFT has been closely correlated with CNA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SAFT jumps, then CNA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SAFT
1D Price
Change %
SAFT100%
+0.21%
CNA - SAFT
69%
Closely correlated
+1.07%
UFCS - SAFT
67%
Closely correlated
-0.04%
HMN - SAFT
67%
Closely correlated
-1.79%
THG - SAFT
66%
Closely correlated
+2.31%
L - SAFT
66%
Loosely correlated
+0.44%
More