Advertisement
PRA vs SAFT
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRA is a Hold and SAFT is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PRA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSAFT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- PRA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- SAFT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PRA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SAFT’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- PRA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
- SAFT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
PRA (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а -0.21% price change this week, while SAFT (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was -0.70% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +0.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.81%.
Reported Earning Dates
PRA is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.
SAFT is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Property/Casualty Insurance (+0.39% weekly)Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.
| PRA | SAFT | PRA / SAFT | |
| Capitalization | 1.22B | 1.08B | 113% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 49.340 | -8.742 | -564% |
| P/E Ratio | 25.01 | 12.67 | 197% |
| Revenue | 1.11B | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | 3.96B | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 439M | 43.7M | 1,005% |
PRA | SAFT | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 96 Overvalued | 15 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 66 | 73 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 91 | 70 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 42 | 60 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 28 | 94 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SAFT's Valuation (15) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is significantly better than the same rating for PRA (96) in the Specialty Insurance industry. This means that SAFT’s stock grew significantly faster than PRA’s over the last 12 months.
PRA's Profit vs Risk Rating (66) in the Specialty Insurance industry is in the same range as SAFT (73) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that PRA’s stock grew similarly to SAFT’s over the last 12 months.
SAFT's SMR Rating (70) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as PRA (91) in the Specialty Insurance industry. This means that SAFT’s stock grew similarly to PRA’s over the last 12 months.
PRA's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Specialty Insurance industry is in the same range as SAFT (60) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that PRA’s stock grew similarly to SAFT’s over the last 12 months.
PRA's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the Specialty Insurance industry is significantly better than the same rating for SAFT (94) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that PRA’s stock grew significantly faster than SAFT’s over the last 12 months.
| PRA | SAFT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 65% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 63% | 4 days ago 57% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 67% | 4 days ago 52% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 5 days ago 52% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 62% | 4 days ago 54% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 65% | 4 days ago 47% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 64% | 11 days ago 56% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 65% | 6 days ago 54% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% | 4 days ago 69% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 48% | 4 days ago 47% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| VCSAX | 108.60 | 0.25 | +0.23% |
| Vanguard Consumer Staples Index Admiral | |||
| NASDX | 43.88 | 0.04 | +0.09% |
| Shelton Nasdaq-100 Index Investor | |||
| WEBCX | 10.68 | 0.01 | +0.09% |
| TETON Westwood Balanced A | |||
| BGATX | 18.62 | N/A | N/A |
| Baillie Gifford Global Alpha Equities 2 | |||
| BWLCX | 23.94 | -0.04 | -0.17% |
| American Beacon Man Lg Cp Value C | |||
PRA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that PRA and UFCS have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PRA and UFCS's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PRA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRA | 100% | N/A | ||
| UFCS - PRA | 31% Poorly correlated | -1.98% | ||
| BOW - PRA | 30% Poorly correlated | -3.12% | ||
| BNT - PRA | 28% Poorly correlated | -0.22% | ||
| SAFT - PRA | 28% Poorly correlated | -0.67% | ||
| ALL - PRA | 27% Poorly correlated | -3.26% | ||
More | ||||
SAFT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SAFT has been closely correlated with UFCS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SAFT jumps, then UFCS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SAFT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAFT | 100% | -0.67% | ||
| UFCS - SAFT | 71% Closely correlated | -1.98% | ||
| CNA - SAFT | 67% Closely correlated | -1.92% | ||
| HMN - SAFT | 67% Closely correlated | -1.45% | ||
| CINF - SAFT | 66% Closely correlated | -1.43% | ||
| L - SAFT | 66% Loosely correlated | -0.91% | ||
More | ||||