PRA
Price
$22.92
Change
-$0.11 (-0.48%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
650.38M
51 days until earnings call
QBIEY
Price
$15.09
Change
-$0.14 (-0.92%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
15.75B
Interact to see
Advertisement

PRA vs QBIEY

Header iconPRA vs QBIEY Comparison
Open Charts PRA vs QBIEYBanner chart's image
ProAssurance
Price$22.92
Change-$0.11 (-0.48%)
Volume$564.87K
Capitalization650.38M
QBE Insurance Group
Price$15.09
Change-$0.14 (-0.92%)
Volume$33.72K
Capitalization15.75B
PRA vs QBIEY Comparison Chart
Loading...
PRA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QBIEY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PRA vs. QBIEY commentary
Jun 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRA is a StrongBuy and QBIEY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 16, 2025
Stock price -- (PRA: $22.92 vs. QBIEY: $15.09)
Brand notoriety: PRA and QBIEY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PRA: 93% vs. QBIEY: 101%
Market capitalization -- PRA: $650.38M vs. QBIEY: $15.75B
PRA [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $650.38M. QBIEY’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $15.75B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $121.13B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $14.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PRA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileQBIEY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • PRA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • QBIEY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, QBIEY is a better buy in the long-term than PRA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PRA’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QBIEY’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PRA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • QBIEY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PRA is a better buy in the short-term than QBIEY.

Price Growth

PRA (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а -0.99% price change this week, while QBIEY (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was -2.20% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was -0.99%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.64%.

Reported Earning Dates

PRA is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (-0.99% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QBIEY($15.8B) has a higher market cap than PRA($650M). PRA has higher P/E ratio than QBIEY: PRA (105.26) vs QBIEY (20.12). PRA YTD gains are higher at: 44.060 vs. QBIEY (31.175). PRA has more cash in the bank: 3.8B vs. QBIEY (833M). PRA has less debt than QBIEY: PRA (444M) vs QBIEY (3.05B). QBIEY has higher revenues than PRA: QBIEY (13.4B) vs PRA (1.13B).
PRAQBIEYPRA / QBIEY
Capitalization650M15.8B4%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD44.06031.175141%
P/E Ratio105.2620.12523%
Revenue1.13B13.4B8%
Total Cash3.8B833M456%
Total Debt444M3.05B15%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PRA vs QBIEY: Fundamental Ratings
PRA
QBIEY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
96
Overvalued
32
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
595
SMR RATING
1..100
9096
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3843
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1860
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

QBIEY's Valuation (32) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PRA (96) in the Specialty Insurance industry. This means that QBIEY’s stock grew somewhat faster than PRA’s over the last 12 months.

QBIEY's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PRA (59) in the Specialty Insurance industry. This means that QBIEY’s stock grew somewhat faster than PRA’s over the last 12 months.

PRA's SMR Rating (90) in the Specialty Insurance industry is in the same range as QBIEY (96) in the null industry. This means that PRA’s stock grew similarly to QBIEY’s over the last 12 months.

PRA's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Specialty Insurance industry is in the same range as QBIEY (43) in the null industry. This means that PRA’s stock grew similarly to QBIEY’s over the last 12 months.

PRA's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the Specialty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QBIEY (60) in the null industry. This means that PRA’s stock grew somewhat faster than QBIEY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PRAQBIEY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 28 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PRA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QBIEY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TRNEX39.670.17
+0.43%
T. Rowe Price New Era I
CMNIX15.36-0.02
-0.13%
Calamos Market Neutral Income I
ACUSX12.62-0.13
-1.02%
Advisors Capital Total Return – Equity
WVALX51.59-0.90
-1.71%
Weitz Large Cap Equity-Investor Cl
TETAX12.55-0.27
-2.11%
RBC Enterprise A

PRA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PRA has been loosely correlated with UFCS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PRA jumps, then UFCS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PRA
1D Price
Change %
PRA100%
-0.48%
UFCS - PRA
37%
Loosely correlated
-2.00%
SAFT - PRA
34%
Loosely correlated
-1.77%
HMN - PRA
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.79%
L - PRA
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.58%
THG - PRA
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.76%
More

QBIEY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QBIEY has been loosely correlated with BNT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QBIEY jumps, then BNT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QBIEY
1D Price
Change %
QBIEY100%
-0.92%
BNT - QBIEY
34%
Loosely correlated
-2.59%
DGICB - QBIEY
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.33%
STC - QBIEY
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.43%
PRA - QBIEY
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.48%
L - QBIEY
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.58%
More