Advertisement
PRA vs QBIEY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRA is a Hold and QBIEY is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PRA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileQBIEY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- PRA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- QBIEY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PRA’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QBIEY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- PRA’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- QBIEY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
PRA (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а -0.04% price change this week, while QBIEY (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was +1.79% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +0.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.82%.
Reported Earning Dates
PRA is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Property/Casualty Insurance (+0.91% weekly)Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.
| PRA | QBIEY | PRA / QBIEY | |
| Capitalization | 1.23B | 21.2B | 6% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 50.409 | 21.048 | 239% |
| P/E Ratio | 25.19 | 10.49 | 240% |
| Revenue | 1.11B | 19.2B | 6% |
| Total Cash | 3.96B | 1.64B | 242% |
| Total Debt | 439M | 2.9B | 15% |
PRA | QBIEY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 18 | 84 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 95 Overvalued | 26 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 64 | 12 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 91 | 94 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 41 | 55 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 26 | 37 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
QBIEY's Valuation (26) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PRA (95) in the Specialty Insurance industry. This means that QBIEY’s stock grew significantly faster than PRA’s over the last 12 months.
QBIEY's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PRA (64) in the Specialty Insurance industry. This means that QBIEY’s stock grew somewhat faster than PRA’s over the last 12 months.
PRA's SMR Rating (91) in the Specialty Insurance industry is in the same range as QBIEY (94) in the null industry. This means that PRA’s stock grew similarly to QBIEY’s over the last 12 months.
PRA's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Specialty Insurance industry is in the same range as QBIEY (55) in the null industry. This means that PRA’s stock grew similarly to QBIEY’s over the last 12 months.
PRA's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the Specialty Insurance industry is in the same range as QBIEY (37) in the null industry. This means that PRA’s stock grew similarly to QBIEY’s over the last 12 months.
| PRA | QBIEY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 55% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 52% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 51% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 65% | 6 days ago 60% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 48% |
Advertisement
PRA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that PRA and UFCS have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PRA and UFCS's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PRA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRA | 100% | +0.17% | ||
| UFCS - PRA | 33% Poorly correlated | -0.39% | ||
| SAFT - PRA | 29% Poorly correlated | -0.12% | ||
| BOW - PRA | 29% Poorly correlated | -1.27% | ||
| BNT - PRA | 28% Poorly correlated | -0.28% | ||
| WTM - PRA | 27% Poorly correlated | -0.35% | ||
More | ||||
QBIEY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QBIEY has been loosely correlated with BNT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QBIEY jumps, then BNT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QBIEY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QBIEY | 100% | +0.83% | ||
| BNT - QBIEY | 34% Loosely correlated | -0.28% | ||
| DGICB - QBIEY | 22% Poorly correlated | -4.36% | ||
| STC - QBIEY | 22% Poorly correlated | -1.27% | ||
| PRA - QBIEY | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.17% | ||
| L - QBIEY | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.43% | ||
More | ||||