PR
Price
$16.14
Change
+$3.34 (+26.09%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
11.73B
21 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WDS
Price
$17.80
Change
+$3.01 (+20.35%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
32.89B
20 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

PR vs WDS

Header iconPR vs WDS Comparison
Open Charts PR vs WDSBanner chart's image
Permian Resources
Price$16.14
Change+$3.34 (+26.09%)
Volume$13.6M
Capitalization11.73B
Woodside Energy Group
Price$17.80
Change+$3.01 (+20.35%)
Volume$958.47K
Capitalization32.89B
PR vs WDS Comparison Chart in %
PR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WDS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PR vs. WDS commentary
Feb 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PR is a Buy and WDS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 04, 2026
Stock price -- (PR: $15.74 vs. WDS: $17.23)
Brand notoriety: PR and WDS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PR: 136% vs. WDS: 99%
Market capitalization -- PR: $11.73B vs. WDS: $32.89B
PR [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $11.73B. WDS’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $32.89B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $125.78B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $4.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PR’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWDS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • PR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WDS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PR is a better buy in the long-term than WDS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WDS’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • WDS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WDS is a better buy in the short-term than PR.

Price Growth

PR (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а +6.64% price change this week, while WDS (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was +2.38% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was +3.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +18.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.58%.

Reported Earning Dates

PR is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2026.

WDS is expected to report earnings on Feb 24, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (+3.21% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WDS($32.9B) has a higher market cap than PR($11.7B). PR has higher P/E ratio than WDS: PR (14.05) vs WDS (11.17). PR YTD gains are higher at: 12.188 vs. WDS (10.520). WDS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 9.55B vs. PR (3.56B). WDS has more cash in the bank: 5.15B vs. PR (138K). PR has less debt than WDS: PR (3.69B) vs WDS (13.6B). WDS has higher revenues than PR: WDS (13.8B) vs PR (5.19B).
PRWDSPR / WDS
Capitalization11.7B32.9B36%
EBITDA3.56B9.55B37%
Gain YTD12.18810.520116%
P/E Ratio14.0511.17126%
Revenue5.19B13.8B38%
Total Cash138K5.15B0%
Total Debt3.69B13.6B27%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PR vs WDS: Fundamental Ratings
PR
WDS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
127
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
91
Overvalued
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2272
SMR RATING
1..100
7594
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4347
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1181
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5041

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WDS's Valuation (13) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PR (91) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that WDS’s stock grew significantly faster than PR’s over the last 12 months.

PR's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WDS (72) in the null industry. This means that PR’s stock grew somewhat faster than WDS’s over the last 12 months.

PR's SMR Rating (75) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as WDS (94) in the null industry. This means that PR’s stock grew similarly to WDS’s over the last 12 months.

PR's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as WDS (47) in the null industry. This means that PR’s stock grew similarly to WDS’s over the last 12 months.

PR's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is significantly better than the same rating for WDS (81) in the null industry. This means that PR’s stock grew significantly faster than WDS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PRWDS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
54%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WDS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MULL199.6620.09
+11.19%
GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF
AADR93.381.17
+1.26%
AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright ADR ETF
FTGS36.060.22
+0.62%
First Trust Growth Strength ETF
GQGU25.42-0.07
-0.27%
GQG US Equity ETF
JXI80.81-0.75
-0.92%
iShares Global Utilities ETF

PR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PR has been closely correlated with OVV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 92% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PR jumps, then OVV could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PR
1D Price
Change %
PR100%
-2.42%
OVV - PR
92%
Closely correlated
-2.28%
MTDR - PR
91%
Closely correlated
-3.47%
CHRD - PR
90%
Closely correlated
-3.62%
FANG - PR
90%
Closely correlated
-3.24%
DVN - PR
88%
Closely correlated
-0.17%
More

WDS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WDS has been closely correlated with OVV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WDS jumps, then OVV could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WDS
1D Price
Change %
WDS100%
-2.21%
OVV - WDS
68%
Closely correlated
-2.28%
FANG - WDS
66%
Closely correlated
-3.24%
VET - WDS
65%
Loosely correlated
-2.69%
DVN - WDS
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.17%
PR - WDS
63%
Loosely correlated
-2.42%
More