Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PPSFX vs RWMHX
PPSFX vs RWMHX Comparison
Open Charts PPSFX vs RWMHX
Principal Large Cap Value III R3
Price$19.48
Change-$2.38 (-10.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.42B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5E
Price$66.01
Change-$1.03 (-1.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets208.21B
PPSFX vs RWMHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PPSFX vs. RWMHX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PPSFX is a Buy and RWMHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMHX has more cash in the bank: 208B vs. PPSFX (2.42B). RWMHX pays higher dividends than PPSFX: RWMHX (1.36) vs PPSFX (1.06). PPSFX was incepted earlier than RWMHX: PPSFX (25 years) vs RWMHX (10 years). PPSFX (1.27) is less costly to investors than RWMHX (0.41). PPSFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.50 vs. RWMHX (29.00). PPSFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMHX: PPSFX (0) vs RWMHX (250). RWMHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.40 vs. PPSFX (-6.14). RWMHX return over 5 years is better than : 37.20 vs. PPSFX (7.59).
| PPSFX | RWMHX | PPSFX / RWMHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.41 | 305% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 0.41 | 310% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.507 | 1.523 | 230% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.42B | 208B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.06 | 1.36 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.14 | 5.40 | -114% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.81 | 30.10 | 26% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.59 | 37.20 | 20% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.93 | 96.94 | 57% |