Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PPSFX vs RWEBX
PPSFX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts PPSFX vs RWEBX
Principal Large Cap Value III R3
Price$19.48
Change-$2.38 (-10.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.42B
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$65.66
Change-$1.07 (-1.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets208.21B
PPSFX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PPSFX vs. RWEBX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PPSFX is a Buy and RWEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 208B vs. PPSFX (2.42B). PPSFX pays higher dividends than RWEBX: PPSFX (1.06) vs RWEBX (0.78). PPSFX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: PPSFX (25 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). PPSFX (1.27) is less costly to investors than RWEBX (1.06). PPSFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.50 vs. RWEBX (29.00). PPSFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWEBX: PPSFX (0) vs RWEBX (250). RWEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.66 vs. PPSFX (-6.14). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 33.53 vs. PPSFX (7.59).
| PPSFX | RWEBX | PPSFX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 1.06 | 118% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 1.06 | 120% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.507 | 1.452 | 241% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.42B | 208B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.06 | 0.78 | 136% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.14 | 4.66 | -132% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.81 | 27.48 | 28% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.59 | 33.53 | 23% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.93 | 91.10 | 60% |