Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PPSFX vs RWEBX
PPSFX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts PPSFX vs RWEBX
Principal Large Cap Value III R3
Price$19.01
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.46B
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$65.44
Change-$0.01 (-0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets209.48B
PPSFX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PPSFX vs. RWEBX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PPSFX is a Hold and RWEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 209B vs. PPSFX (2.46B). PPSFX pays higher dividends than RWEBX: PPSFX (0.82) vs RWEBX (0.74). PPSFX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: PPSFX (25 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). PPSFX (1.27) is less costly to investors than RWEBX (1.06). PPSFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.10 vs. RWEBX (29.00). PPSFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWEBX: PPSFX (0) vs RWEBX (250). RWEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.48 vs. PPSFX (-7.81). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 38.15 vs. PPSFX (7.91).
| PPSFX | RWEBX | PPSFX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 1.06 | 118% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 1.06 | 120% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.539 | 7.632 | -86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.46B | 209B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 0.74 | 111% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.81 | 5.48 | -143% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.51 | 30.16 | 25% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.91 | 38.15 | 21% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.74 | 75.06 | 48% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers