Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PPSFX vs RMFCX
PPSFX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts PPSFX vs RMFCX
Principal Large Cap Value III R3
Price$21.92
Change-$0.21 (-0.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.89B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.57
Change-$0.70 (-1.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.28B
PPSFX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PPSFX vs. RMFCX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PPSFX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. PPSFX (2.89B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than PPSFX: RMFCX (1.21) vs PPSFX (0.83). PPSFX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: PPSFX (25 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). PPSFX (1.27) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). PPSFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.10 vs. RMFCX (31.00). PPSFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: PPSFX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.67 vs. PPSFX (-2.30). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 54.90 vs. PPSFX (30.72).
| PPSFX | RMFCX | PPSFX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.91 | 137% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 0.91 | 140% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.800 | 15.093 | 58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.89B | 112B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.83 | 1.21 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.30 | 6.67 | -35% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.70 | 30.56 | 42% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.72 | 54.90 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.30 | 94.04 | 56% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement