Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PPSFX vs RMEBX
PPSFX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts PPSFX vs RMEBX
Principal Large Cap Value III R3
Price$21.92
Change-$0.21 (-0.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.89B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$61.91
Change-$0.71 (-1.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.28B
PPSFX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PPSFX vs. RMEBX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PPSFX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. PPSFX (2.89B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than PPSFX: RMEBX (1.05) vs PPSFX (0.83). PPSFX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: PPSFX (25 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). PPSFX (1.27) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). PPSFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.10 vs. RMEBX (31.00). PPSFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: PPSFX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.55 vs. PPSFX (-2.30). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 53.80 vs. PPSFX (30.72).
| PPSFX | RMEBX | PPSFX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 1.07 | 117% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 1.07 | 119% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.800 | 14.940 | 59% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.89B | 112B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.83 | 1.05 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.30 | 6.55 | -35% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.70 | 30.03 | 42% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.72 | 53.80 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.30 | 92.20 | 57% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers