It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PPIH’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTT’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PPIH’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TT’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
PPIH (@Building Products) experienced а +0.14% price change this week, while TT (@Building Products) price change was +5.91% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Building Products industry was -0.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.20%.
PPIH is expected to report earnings on Dec 05, 2024.
TT is expected to report earnings on Jan 29, 2025.
The industry manufactures products used in the construction of residential and commercial buildings. The process involves using materials and other products, and processing them to create finished items such as doors, windows, light fittings, floor coverings, climate control products and other building components and home improvement products. Masco Corporation, Allegion PLC and Lennox International Inc. are major manufacturers of such products.
PPIH | TT | PPIH / TT | |
Capitalization | 62.8M | 67.4B | 0% |
EBITDA | 14.8M | 3.15B | 0% |
Gain YTD | 85.584 | 71.529 | 120% |
P/E Ratio | 12.60 | 33.38 | 38% |
Revenue | 139M | 17.7B | 1% |
Total Cash | 6.1M | 1.1B | 1% |
Total Debt | 37.2M | 4.78B | 1% |
PPIH | TT | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 74 | 12 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 57 Fair valued | 92 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 48 | 3 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 75 | 29 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 36 | 12 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 87 | 28 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PPIH's Valuation (57) in the Industrial Machinery industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TT (92) in the null industry. This means that PPIH’s stock grew somewhat faster than TT’s over the last 12 months.
TT's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PPIH (48) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that TT’s stock grew somewhat faster than PPIH’s over the last 12 months.
TT's SMR Rating (29) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PPIH (75) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that TT’s stock grew somewhat faster than PPIH’s over the last 12 months.
TT's Price Growth Rating (12) in the null industry is in the same range as PPIH (36) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that TT’s stock grew similarly to PPIH’s over the last 12 months.
TT's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PPIH (87) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that TT’s stock grew somewhat faster than PPIH’s over the last 12 months.
PPIH | TT | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago59% | 2 days ago43% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% | 2 days ago44% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago67% | 2 days ago76% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago69% | 2 days ago71% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago69% | 2 days ago72% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago70% | 2 days ago73% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago0% | 4 days ago73% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago70% | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago72% | 2 days ago45% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago70% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that PPIH and GMS have been poorly correlated (+18% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PPIH and GMS's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PPIH | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
PPIH | 100% | +2.01% | ||
GMS - PPIH | 18% Poorly correlated | -0.10% | ||
CSL - PPIH | 17% Poorly correlated | +0.40% | ||
CARR - PPIH | 16% Poorly correlated | +1.27% | ||
ILAG - PPIH | 12% Poorly correlated | +1.20% | ||
TT - PPIH | 11% Poorly correlated | +0.94% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TT has been loosely correlated with LII. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TT jumps, then LII could also see price increases.