Advertisement
PPASF vs WHGPF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PPASF is a Hold and WHGPF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PPASF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWHGPF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- PPASF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- WHGPF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Price Growth
PPASF (@Department Stores) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while WHGPF (@Department Stores) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Department Stores industry was +1.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.42%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Department Stores (+1.22% weekly)A department store sells a wide variety of consumer goods under different “departments,” including (but not necessarily limited to) apparel, household appliances, home furnishings, personal care products, cosmetics, consumer electronics. During healthy macroeconomic conditions, consumers typically won’t shy away from big-ticket purchases; but during a downturn, consumer spending might get limited to the most necessary/daily essentials. Several department stores purchase items on bulk from manufacturers for resale to consumers at a profit. Some of the largest department stores companies in the U.S. include Kohl’s Corporation, Macy’s Inc., and Ollie’s Bargain Outlet Holdings Inc.
| PPASF | WHGPF | PPASF / WHGPF | |
| Capitalization | 1.09B | 166M | 657% |
| EBITDA | 2.23B | 136M | 1,639% |
| Gain YTD | 0.000 | -7.095 | - |
| P/E Ratio | 97.21 | 51.89 | 187% |
| Revenue | 114B | 3.01B | 3,785% |
| Total Cash | 4.95B | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 26B | N/A | - |
| PPASF | WHGPF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 8% | 3 days ago 10% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 9% | 3 days ago 11% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Advertisement
PPASF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that PPASF and ELPQF have been poorly correlated (+0% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PPASF and ELPQF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PPASF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PPASF | 100% | N/A | ||
| ELPQF - PPASF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| LCMRF - PPASF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| WHGPF - PPASF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A |
WHGPF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that WHGPF and ELPQF have been poorly correlated (+0% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WHGPF and ELPQF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WHGPF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WHGPF | 100% | N/A | ||
| ELPQF - WHGPF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| LCMRF - WHGPF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| PPASF - WHGPF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A |