POSC
Price
$1.82
Change
+$0.03 (+1.68%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
56.97M
SAFLF
Price
$1.50
Change
+$0.21 (+16.28%)
Updated
Aug 13 closing price
Capitalization
640.51M
Interact to see
Advertisement

POSC vs SAFLF

Header iconPOSC vs SAFLF Comparison
Open Charts POSC vs SAFLFBanner chart's image
Positron
Price$1.82
Change+$0.03 (+1.68%)
Volume$28.39K
Capitalization56.97M
Safilo Group Spa
Price$1.50
Change+$0.21 (+16.28%)
Volume$126.74K
Capitalization640.51M
POSC vs SAFLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
POSC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SAFLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
POSC vs. SAFLF commentary
Aug 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is POSC is a Buy and SAFLF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 17, 2025
Stock price -- (POSC: $1.82 vs. SAFLF: $1.50)
Brand notoriety: POSC and SAFLF are both not notable
POSC represents the Medical/Nursing Services, while SAFLF is part of the Pharmaceuticals: Other industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: POSC: 167% vs. SAFLF: 1499%
Market capitalization -- POSC: $56.97M vs. SAFLF: $640.51M
POSC [@Medical/Nursing Services] is valued at $56.97M. SAFLF’s [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] market capitalization is $640.51M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry ranges from $229.31B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry ranges from $172.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry is $5.55B. The average market capitalization across the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry is $11.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

POSC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSAFLF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • POSC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SAFLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, POSC is a better buy in the long-term than SAFLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

POSC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SAFLF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • POSC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SAFLF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both POSC and SAFLF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

POSC (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а +11.04% price change this week, while SAFLF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) price change was +16.64% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was +7.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.22%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was +0.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.82%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Medical/Nursing Services (+7.68% weekly)

The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.

@Pharmaceuticals: Other (+0.19% weekly)

Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SAFLF($641M) has a higher market cap than POSC($57M). SAFLF has higher P/E ratio than POSC: SAFLF (11.44) vs POSC (0.09). POSC YTD gains are higher at: 80.198 vs. SAFLF (53.014).
POSCSAFLFPOSC / SAFLF
Capitalization57M641M9%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD80.19853.014151%
P/E Ratio0.0911.441%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
POSC vs SAFLF: Fundamental Ratings
POSC
SAFLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1949
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
23
Undervalued
63
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4473
SMR RATING
1..100
10048
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3937
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8533

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

POSC's Valuation (23) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SAFLF (63). This means that POSC’s stock grew somewhat faster than SAFLF’s over the last 12 months.

POSC's Profit vs Risk Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as SAFLF (73). This means that POSC’s stock grew similarly to SAFLF’s over the last 12 months.

SAFLF's SMR Rating (48) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for POSC (100). This means that SAFLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than POSC’s over the last 12 months.

SAFLF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as POSC (39). This means that SAFLF’s stock grew similarly to POSC’s over the last 12 months.

SAFLF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as POSC (100). This means that SAFLF’s stock grew similarly to POSC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
POSCSAFLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
25%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
21%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
70%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
85%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
40%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
POSC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SAFLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IMDXF2.170.42
+23.65%
Imdex Ltd.
DBLVF0.400.03
+9.18%
Doubleview Gold Corp.
DSKYF24.300.21
+0.86%
Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd.
CIBEY1.93-0.03
-1.28%
Commercial International Bank Ltd.
CLCFF0.03N/A
-2.67%
Christina Lake Cannabis Corp.

POSC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that POSC and SLDX have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that POSC and SLDX's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To POSC
1D Price
Change %
POSC100%
+1.68%
SLDX - POSC
26%
Poorly correlated
-46.67%
GGNDF - POSC
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PCHM - POSC
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PFGTF - POSC
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SAFLF - POSC
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SAFLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SAFLF and ICCM have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SAFLF and ICCM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SAFLF
1D Price
Change %
SAFLF100%
N/A
ICCM - SAFLF
28%
Poorly correlated
+6.74%
MDXH - SAFLF
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.35%
XAIR - SAFLF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GRRMF - SAFLF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AMBBY - SAFLF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More