POSC
Price
$1.62
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
442.55K
RDGL
Price
$0.13
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
23.83M
Interact to see
Advertisement

POSC vs RDGL

Header iconPOSC vs RDGL Comparison
Open Charts POSC vs RDGLBanner chart's image
Positron
Price$1.62
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$423
Capitalization442.55K
Vivos
Price$0.13
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$911.05K
Capitalization23.83M
POSC vs RDGL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
POSC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RDGL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
POSC vs. RDGL commentary
Jul 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is POSC is a StrongBuy and RDGL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 28, 2025
Stock price -- (POSC: $1.62 vs. RDGL: $0.13)
Brand notoriety: POSC and RDGL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Medical Specialties industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: POSC: 4% vs. RDGL: 115%
Market capitalization -- POSC: $442.55K vs. RDGL: $23.83M
POSC [@Medical Specialties] is valued at $442.55K. RDGL’s [@Medical Specialties] market capitalization is $23.83M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical Specialties] industry ranges from $3.82T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical Specialties] industry is $8.76B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

POSC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRDGL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • POSC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RDGL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, POSC is a better buy in the long-term than RDGL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

POSC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RDGL’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • POSC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • RDGL’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RDGL is a better buy in the short-term than POSC.

Price Growth

POSC (@Medical Specialties) experienced а +11.15% price change this week, while RDGL (@Medical Specialties) price change was -4.38% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical Specialties industry was +3.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.87%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Medical Specialties (+3.05% weekly)

Medical specialties are companies that make equipment used by the health care industry. Equipment manufactured and distributed by these companies include dialysis machines, blood analysis equipment, surgical equipment, dental instruments, and diagnostic tools, among other items. Large companies typically aim to produce and distribute high-quality products across a broad market spectrum. Smaller firms are more likely to specialize in a particular market segment. Due to the industry’s close association with medical treatments, they typically have low sensitivity to macroeconomic fluctuations. Within this industry, Abbott Laboratories, Medtronic Plc and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. are some of the companies with multi-billion market capitalizations in the U.S. stock markets.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RDGL($23.8M) has a higher market cap than POSC($443K). POSC YTD gains are higher at: 60.396 vs. RDGL (14.012). POSC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -699K vs. RDGL (-1.97M). RDGL has more cash in the bank: 1.41M vs. POSC (28K). RDGL has less debt than POSC: RDGL (295K) vs POSC (962K). POSC has higher revenues than RDGL: POSC (1.24M) vs RDGL (29.5K).
POSCRDGLPOSC / RDGL
Capitalization443K23.8M2%
EBITDA-699K-1.97M35%
Gain YTD60.39614.012431%
P/E Ratio0.09N/A-
Revenue1.24M29.5K4,193%
Total Cash28K1.41M2%
Total Debt962K295K326%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
POSC vs RDGL: Fundamental Ratings
POSC
RDGL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4450
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
24
Undervalued
60
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4968
SMR RATING
1..100
10099
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4853
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10081
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

POSC's Valuation (24) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RDGL (60). This means that POSC’s stock grew somewhat faster than RDGL’s over the last 12 months.

POSC's Profit vs Risk Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as RDGL (68). This means that POSC’s stock grew similarly to RDGL’s over the last 12 months.

RDGL's SMR Rating (99) in the null industry is in the same range as POSC (100). This means that RDGL’s stock grew similarly to POSC’s over the last 12 months.

POSC's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as RDGL (53). This means that POSC’s stock grew similarly to RDGL’s over the last 12 months.

RDGL's P/E Growth Rating (81) in the null industry is in the same range as POSC (100). This means that RDGL’s stock grew similarly to POSC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
POSCRDGL
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
89%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
POSC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RDGL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CNFR0.900.01
+1.12%
Conifer Holdings
CTRE31.26N/A
N/A
CareTrust REIT
ALCY11.72N/A
N/A
Alchemy Investments Acquisition Corp
YALA7.75-0.28
-3.49%
Yalla Group Limited
TECK33.00-2.12
-6.04%
Teck Resources Limited

POSC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that POSC and SLDX have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that POSC and SLDX's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To POSC
1D Price
Change %
POSC100%
N/A
SLDX - POSC
26%
Poorly correlated
+215.32%
GGNDF - POSC
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PCHM - POSC
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PFGTF - POSC
6%
Poorly correlated
-64.85%
SAFLF - POSC
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

RDGL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RDGL and RYLPF have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RDGL and RYLPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RDGL
1D Price
Change %
RDGL100%
-1.47%
RYLPF - RDGL
7%
Poorly correlated
-1.24%
SAFLY - RDGL
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
POSC - RDGL
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SARTF - RDGL
2%
Poorly correlated
-7.96%
PLLWF - RDGL
-3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More