PNXPF
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 1 closing price
Capitalization
4.17M
RHCO
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

PNXPF vs RHCO

Header iconPNXPF vs RHCO Comparison
Open Charts PNXPF vs RHCOBanner chart's image
Planet Ventures
Price$0.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$20K
Capitalization4.17M
Readen Holding
Price$0.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.2K
CapitalizationN/A
PNXPF vs RHCO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PNXPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RHCO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PNXPF vs. RHCO commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PNXPF is a Hold and RHCO is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (PNXPF: $0.05 vs. RHCO: $0.05)
Brand notoriety: PNXPF and RHCO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PNXPF: 179% vs. RHCO: 4%
Market capitalization -- PNXPF: $4.17M vs. RHCO: $0
PNXPF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $4.17M. RHCO’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PNXPF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRHCO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • PNXPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RHCO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, PNXPF is a better buy in the long-term than RHCO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PNXPF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RHCO’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PNXPF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • RHCO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RHCO is a better buy in the short-term than PNXPF.

Price Growth

PNXPF (@Investment Managers) experienced а -3.42% price change this week, while RHCO (@Investment Managers) price change was +60.77% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.30%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+2.13% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RHCO YTD gains are higher at: 212.500 vs. PNXPF (119.417).
PNXPFRHCOPNXPF / RHCO
Capitalization4.17MN/A-
EBITDA-1.94MN/A-
Gain YTD119.417212.50056%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue-1.84MN/A-
Total Cash5.13MN/A-
Total Debt327KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PNXPF vs RHCO: Fundamental Ratings
PNXPF
RHCO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
83
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10092
SMR RATING
1..100
17100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3436
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3492
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PNXPF's Valuation (72) in the null industry is in the same range as RHCO (83). This means that PNXPF’s stock grew similarly to RHCO’s over the last 12 months.

RHCO's Profit vs Risk Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as PNXPF (100). This means that RHCO’s stock grew similarly to PNXPF’s over the last 12 months.

PNXPF's SMR Rating (17) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for RHCO (100). This means that PNXPF’s stock grew significantly faster than RHCO’s over the last 12 months.

PNXPF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as RHCO (36). This means that PNXPF’s stock grew similarly to RHCO’s over the last 12 months.

PNXPF's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RHCO (92). This means that PNXPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RHCO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PNXPFRHCO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
87%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PNXPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RHCO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BOOT164.934.74
+2.96%
Boot Barn Holdings
ALNT38.760.69
+1.81%
Allient
TKLF3.730.03
+0.87%
Tokyo Lifestyle Co Ltd
RMBI14.05-0.02
-0.14%
Richmond Mutual Bancorporation
SNAP9.27-0.11
-1.17%
Snap

PNXPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PNXPF and RMGOF have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PNXPF and RMGOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PNXPF
1D Price
Change %
PNXPF100%
N/A
RMGOF - PNXPF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SFFFF - PNXPF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MNGPF - PNXPF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RHCO - PNXPF
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.63%
LGGNY - PNXPF
1%
Poorly correlated
+1.05%
More

RHCO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RHCO and AJMPF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RHCO and AJMPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RHCO
1D Price
Change %
RHCO100%
+1.63%
AJMPF - RHCO
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WHF - RHCO
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.11%
SLFPY - RHCO
15%
Poorly correlated
+7.36%
SLFPF - RHCO
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RAFI - RHCO
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.31%
More