Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PNSIX vs TRASX
PNSIX vs TRASX Comparison
Open Charts PNSIX vs TRASX
T. Rowe Price New Asia I
Price$18.55
Change+$0.10 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.91B
T. Rowe Price Asia Opportunities I
Price$17.23
Change+$0.07 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets72.82M
PNSIX vs TRASX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PNSIX vs. TRASX commentary
Jul 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PNSIX is a StrongBuy and TRASX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PNSIX has more cash in the bank: 1.91B vs. TRASX (72.8M). PNSIX pays higher dividends than TRASX: PNSIX (1.16) vs TRASX (0.36). PNSIX was incepted earlier than TRASX: PNSIX (10 years) vs TRASX (8 years). TRASX (1.27) is less costly to investors than PNSIX (0.86). TRASX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.90 vs. PNSIX (54.80). PNSIX (500000) and TRASX (500000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. TRASX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.88 vs. PNSIX (9.32). TRASX return over 5 years is better than : 9.05 vs. PNSIX (-2.48).
| PNSIX | TRASX | PNSIX / TRASX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.83 | 100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.27 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.278 | 12.248 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 500000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.91B | 72.8M | 2,629% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.16 | 0.36 | 326% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.32 | 10.88 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.09 | 17.36 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.48 | 9.05 | -27% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement