Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PNSCX vs WCMLX
PNSCX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts PNSCX vs WCMLX
Putnam Small Cap Growth C
Price$65.13
Change+$0.06 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.91B
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$14.08
Change+$0.01 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.65M
PNSCX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PNSCX vs. WCMLX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PNSCX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PNSCX has more cash in the bank: 2.91B vs. WCMLX (44.7M). PNSCX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . PNSCX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: PNSCX (24 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). PNSCX (1.93) is less costly to investors than WCMLX (1.79). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. PNSCX (51.00). PNSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: PNSCX (0) vs WCMLX (100000). PNSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.68 vs. WCMLX (8.14). PNSCX return over 5 years is better than : 9.65 vs. WCMLX (-4.02).
| PNSCX | WCMLX | PNSCX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 0.99 | 195% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 1.79 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.558 | 9.487 | 111% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.91B | 44.7M | 6,501% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.68 | 8.14 | 107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.35 | 33.08 | 195% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.65 | -4.02 | -240% |
| Returns for 10 years | 148.30 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers