Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PNSCX vs WCMLX
PNSCX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts PNSCX vs WCMLX
Putnam Small Cap Growth C
Price$64.73
Change+$0.66 (+1.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.91B
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$14.06
Change+$0.20 (+1.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.36M
PNSCX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PNSCX vs. WCMLX commentary
Dec 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PNSCX is a Buy and WCMLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PNSCX has more cash in the bank: 2.91B vs. WCMLX (44.4M). PNSCX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . PNSCX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: PNSCX (24 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). PNSCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than WCMLX (1.79). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. PNSCX (40.00). PNSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: PNSCX (0) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.86 vs. PNSCX (0.40). PNSCX return over 5 years is better than : 17.88 vs. WCMLX (1.74).
| PNSCX | WCMLX | PNSCX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 0.99 | 198% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 1.79 | 109% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.879 | 9.331 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.91B | 44.4M | 6,561% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.40 | 0.86 | 47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.85 | 23.77 | 222% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.88 | 1.74 | 1,030% |
| Returns for 10 years | 141.08 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers