Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PNSCX vs WCMLX
PNSCX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts PNSCX vs WCMLX
Putnam Small Cap Growth C
Price$61.93
Change-$2.44 (-3.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.84B
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.25
Change-$0.44 (-3.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.88M
PNSCX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PNSCX vs. WCMLX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PNSCX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PNSCX has more cash in the bank: 2.84B vs. WCMLX (41.9M). PNSCX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . PNSCX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: PNSCX (24 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). PNSCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than WCMLX (1.79). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. PNSCX (40.00). PNSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: PNSCX (0) vs WCMLX (100000). PNSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.55 vs. WCMLX (-5.29). PNSCX return over 5 years is better than : 10.99 vs. WCMLX (1.38).
| PNSCX | WCMLX | PNSCX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 0.99 | 198% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 1.79 | 109% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.126 | 3.033 | 169% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.84B | 41.9M | 6,780% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.55 | -5.29 | 48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.35 | 20.89 | 241% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.99 | 1.38 | 798% |
| Returns for 10 years | 135.39 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement