Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PNSCX vs WCMLX
PNSCX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts PNSCX vs WCMLX
Putnam Small Cap Growth C
Price$66.78
Change+$1.13 (+1.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.94B
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$14.64
Change+$0.83 (+6.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets47.08M
PNSCX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PNSCX vs. WCMLX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PNSCX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PNSCX has more cash in the bank: 2.94B vs. WCMLX (47.1M). PNSCX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . PNSCX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: PNSCX (24 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). PNSCX (1.93) is less costly to investors than WCMLX (1.79). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. PNSCX (51.00). PNSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: PNSCX (0) vs WCMLX (100000). PNSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.64 vs. WCMLX (8.52). PNSCX return over 5 years is better than : 4.93 vs. WCMLX (-5.30).
| PNSCX | WCMLX | PNSCX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 0.99 | 195% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 1.79 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.414 | 6.395 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.94B | 47.1M | 6,234% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.64 | 8.52 | 125% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.83 | 19.51 | 281% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.93 | -5.30 | -93% |
| Returns for 10 years | 210.03 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers