Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PNSAX vs WCMLX
PNSAX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts PNSAX vs WCMLX
Putnam Small Cap Growth A
Price$81.37
Change+$0.83 (+1.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.91B
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$14.06
Change+$0.20 (+1.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.36M
PNSAX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PNSAX vs. WCMLX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PNSAX is a Buy and WCMLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PNSAX has more cash in the bank: 2.91B vs. WCMLX (44.4M). PNSAX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . PNSAX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: PNSAX (28 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than PNSAX (1.21). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. PNSAX (40.00). PNSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: PNSAX (0) vs WCMLX (100000). PNSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.01 vs. WCMLX (-1.14). PNSAX return over 5 years is better than : 20.07 vs. WCMLX (1.99).
| PNSAX | WCMLX | PNSAX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 0.99 | 122% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 1.79 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.519 | 7.621 | 125% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.91B | 44.4M | 6,561% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.01 | -1.14 | -1% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.74 | 21.83 | 251% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.07 | 1.99 | 1,008% |
| Returns for 10 years | 168.56 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement