Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PNOYX vs RGACX
PNOYX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts PNOYX vs RGACX
Putnam Sustainable Leaders Y
Price$145.70
Change+$0.60 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.48B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$83.62
Change+$0.46 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
PNOYX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PNOYX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PNOYX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. PNOYX (6.48B). PNOYX pays higher dividends than RGACX: PNOYX (0.60) vs RGACX (0.07). PNOYX was incepted earlier than RGACX: PNOYX (31 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than PNOYX (0.62). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. PNOYX (22.00). PNOYX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: PNOYX (0) vs RGACX (250). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.05 vs. PNOYX (2.82). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 42.51 vs. PNOYX (24.94).
| PNOYX | RGACX | PNOYX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.94 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.94 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.979 | 16.155 | 31% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.48B | 332B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.60 | 0.07 | 849% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.82 | 21.05 | 13% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.62 | 51.55 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.94 | 42.51 | 59% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.87 | 97.10 | 93% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement