Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PNOYX vs RGACX
PNOYX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts PNOYX vs RGACX
Putnam Sustainable Leaders Y
Price$143.46
Change-$0.70 (-0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.41B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$81.29
Change-$1.00 (-1.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.64B
PNOYX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PNOYX vs. RGACX commentary
Aug 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PNOYX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 330B vs. PNOYX (6.41B). PNOYX pays higher dividends than RGACX: PNOYX (0.61) vs RGACX (0.07). PNOYX was incepted earlier than RGACX: PNOYX (31 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than PNOYX (0.62). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. PNOYX (22.00). PNOYX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: PNOYX (0) vs RGACX (250). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.81 vs. PNOYX (-1.94). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 38.00 vs. PNOYX (23.77).
| PNOYX | RGACX | PNOYX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.94 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.94 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.365 | 12.918 | 26% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.41B | 330B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.61 | 0.07 | 841% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.94 | 11.81 | -16% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.42 | 43.79 | 56% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.77 | 38.00 | 63% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.09 | 93.80 | 95% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers